While George is premiering his dark comedy Suburbicon (which he directed and co-wrote) at the festival, the trip has not been all work for the happy new parents.
Since arriving in Venice earlier in the week, the Clooneys have enjoyed several fun nights out. After a pre-festival date night out on the town on Thursday, the couple stepped out for a glamorous dinner on Friday, with Amal looking stunning in a blue Missoni gown. Earlier in the day, George made a picture-perfect entrance at the festival, arriving in a boat (sans Amal) and posing for a photo call for his new film.
The trip to Venice is a quick one for the pair, who have spent much of the summer at their home on Lake Como in Italy wth the twins, Ella and Alexander. Since the twins’ arrival in June, the Clooney clan has spent low-key time with close friends and family, including Amal’s mother, Baria Alamuddin, in both the U.K. and Italy.
By mid-July, George, 56, and Amal, 39, started enjoying a few parents-nights-out and were spotted dining – and beaming – at il Gatto Nero, one of their favorite haunts in northern Italy. “You could tell they were happy about the date night,” an onlooker told PEOPLE at the time. “In the past, they always dined for hours. This time, it was obvious they didn’t want to be out too late.”
An Italian summer has suited the family, a source previously told PEOPLE: “The weather has been fantastic — sunny and warm every day. George and Amal are enjoying the summer with their babies. Both seem very happy.”
The insider added, “George and Amal are very hands-on. The babies keep them very busy, but they both seem to love being parents.”
Though the pair was spotted enjoying the occasional date night, another source told PEOPLE that the late evenings are “a rare occasion.”
“It’s like they enjoy having a night out with friends, but the babies are still the main priority,” explained the second source.
RELATED VIDEO: ‘Everything in My Life Has Changed Over Time’: How George Clooney Decided He Wanted to Be a Dad
It hasn’t been all smooth sailing, however. George publicly spoke out in late July, slamming a French tabloid magazine after photographers “scaled our fence, climbed our tree and illegally took pictures of our infants inside our home.” The actor announced his plans to pursue legal action against the paparazzi.
That aside, it’s been a wonderfully low-key summer for the Clooneys as they adjust to being new parents – a role they’ve embraced. George opened up to the Associated Press last week about how life has changed since welcoming little Ella and Alexander, noting, “Suddenly, you’re responsible for other people, which is terrifying.”
Yet, Amal is handling it “so beautifully,” he said: “She’s like an Olympic athlete.” George added, “Right now my job is changing diapers and walking them around a little bit. I really didn’t think at 56 that I would be the parent of twins. Don’t make plans. You always have to just enjoy the ride.”
President Trump on Friday told reporters that he would announce a decision on an Obama-era immigration program “sometime today or over the weekend,” raising the prospect of another White House news dump. A short time later, however, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that Tuesday will be the day Trump makes the call on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which offers two-year work permits to people who were brought to the United States illegally as children.
After threatening to bury his announcement under the hubbub of a holiday weekend, Trump has effectively put neon lights on it, instead. The public and the press will have almost a full business week to pick it apart.
The president’s initial tease came as no surprise. He has wrestled publicly with his decision and is guaranteed to spark outrage no matter what he does. He vowed as a candidate to rescind the executive action President Barack Obama signed in 2012 and would surely infuriate many supporters if he were to break his promise. He is equally certain to anger opponents by keeping his word.
There is even a third group, comprising such prominent Republicans as House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (Wis.) and Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (Utah), that wants Trump to tear up Obama’s order, but only after Congress passes a replacement. These lawmakers’ principal objection is not to the policy but to the way Obama implemented it.
A textbook news dump — carefully timed to avoid the full attention of the public and the press because much of the reaction will be unfavorable — would have made sense and been in keeping with White House practices.
Only a week ago, Trump dumped his pardon of former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and the details of a ban on transgender military service members late on a Friday as Hurricane Harvey made landfall in Texas. On Monday, he had the gall to claim that he was trying to amplify the news, not bury it, by releasing it at a time when the country was almost singularly focused on the storm.
“In the middle of a hurricane, even though it was a Friday evening, I assumed the ratings would be far higher than they would be normally,” he told reporters at a joint news conference with Finland’s president.
(What would have been Trump’s excuse on DACA? He thought TV ratings would be higher on Labor Day weekend because vacationers would be checking traffic reports?)
Trump knows how to attract eyeballs when he wants to. Think of the news conference he called in prime time on a Tuesday to nominate Neil M. Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Emailing a written statement to reporters just before a natural disaster is not the way to draw the spotlight.
It is impossible to completely hide news, of course, and anything as significant — and polarizing — as the way the country enforces immigration laws would have generated coverage long past Labor Day, anyway. The news dump ain’t what it used to be, in the days when information traveled mostly on paper.
But the effectiveness of a news dump in 2017 is beside the point; the point is whether the president tries to slip one past us or boldly speaks his mind.
If Trump follows through on his campaign pledge, supporters might wonder why he did not do so on his first day in office, as promised, but they should be heartened by his willingness to make the announcement with fanfare.
And if he disappoints those same people by breaking his promise, perhaps he will get some credit for being upfront.