Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Washington National Cathedral to remove stained glass windows honoring Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson

September 7, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off


Craftsmen at Washington National Cathedral work Wednesday to replace symbols of the Confederacy from a stained-glass window. (Evelyn Hockstein for The Washington Post)

Leaders at Washington National Cathedral, the closest thing in the country’s capital to an official church, have decided after two years of study and debate to remove two stained-glass windows honoring Confederate figures Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.

Saying the stories told in the two 4-by-6-foot windows were painful, distracting and one-sided, a majority of the Cathedral’s governing body voted to remove the windows Tuesday night. On Wednesday morning, stone masons were at work putting up scaffolding to begin taking out the art that was installed 64 years ago.

“This isn’t simply a conversation about the history of the windows, but a very real conversation in the wider culture about how the Confederate flag and the Old South narrative have been lively symbols today for white supremacists. We’d be made of stone ourselves if we weren’t paying attention to that,” said Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde, leader of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, which includes the cathedral.

The cathedral is the official seat of the Episcopal Church, a small Protestant denomination that historically has counted many of America’s elite as members, including presidents from George Washington and James Madison to George H.W. Bush. It is the second largest church building in the country and is typically host to official events like presidential funerals and official interfaith ceremonies on presidential swearing-in days, including that of President Trump.

The removal of the windows, which will take a couple days, reflects a flurry of national debate over whether to take down monuments, statues or art that honor Confederates in both public and private spaces across the country. The issue gained prominence after a mass killing at a black church in Charleston, S.C., in 2015, and then again last month after a deadly white supremacist march in Charlottesville. Several dozen monuments have been either removed or a debate to remove them is on the table, in places from New Orleans and Baltimore to Helena, Mont., and Los Angeles.

Budde and Cathedral Dean Randy Hollerith said the governing board voted “overwhelmingly” Tuesday to remove the windows, but acknowledged there were opponents who felt the windows are part of the cathedral and U.S. history and could be contextualized rather than removed.

A call to the United Daughters of the Confederacy, which raised money for the initial windows along with a private donor, was not immediately returned Wednesday.

 

On Wednesday as the scaffolding was put up, some visitors began gathering, including a few who seemed concerned by the idea that the windows were being taken out.

The windows are among some 200 in the soaring Gothic building, in addition to hundreds of other carvings and fabric and other kinds of art. They are located in a bay in the middle of the nave, or sanctuary space. They each have four panels, one honoring the life of Jackson and the other of Lee.

They show the men at points in their academic, military and spiritual lives. Kevin Eckstrom, a cathedral spokesman, noted that they are praised in wording alongside the windows as pious Christians. “The problem is that they are shown as saints,” he said Wednesday.

The cathedral plans to keep the windows and find a way to display them in historical context, he said.

“People ask: ‘Are we whitewashing history and trying to forget reality?’ But the truth is that slavery is as old as the Bible. But we believe in a God that liberates slaves,” he said.

They were put up in 1953, after years of fundraising. Eckstrom said there was discussion at the time about featuring other U.S. figures, including former president Ulysses S. Grant, who commanded the Union armies at the end of the Civil War, but that donors insisted that the windows honor Southerners. The engraved stone under the Jackson window notes his admirers “from South to North.”

Both stones praise the men’s religious character. Jackson’s says he “walked humbly before his creator.” Lee’s says he was “a Christian soldier without fear and without reproach.”

They were uncontroversial at the time of their installation, Eckstrom said.

After the Charleston killings, a national conversation became louder about Confederate symbols and white supremacy. The cathedral’s dean Gary Hall at the time said that the windows had no place in a place of worship meant for all Americans.

The windows were installed in 1953 to “foster reconciliation between parts of the nation that had been divided by the Civil War,” Hall said in 2015. “While the impetus behind the windows’ installation was a good and noble one at the time, the Cathedral has changed, and so has the America it seeks to represent. There is no place for the Confederate battle flag in the iconography of the nation’s most visible faith community. We cannot in good conscience justify the presence of the Confederate flag in this house of prayer for all people, nor can we honor the systematic oppression of African-Americans for which these two men fought.”

The cathedral then created a task force to discuss the windows and how to best foster a conversation around racial reconciliation. Last year it removed from the windows two small pieces of glass depicting Confederate flags in the art. One was replaced with plain red and the other with plain blue.

Public lectures were held about white supremacy, reconciliation and African American spirituals. Standing beside the windows for months has been a poster about the window discussion, and Eckstrom said the cathedral has received email and visitors every day for two years with different views about how to deal with controversial history in a sacred, public space.

Hall left the cathedral in 2015 and a couple days after the Charlottesville violence shared on Facebook his earlier push for the windows to come out, with the comment: “Just sayin’.”

Asked whether the cathedral was told its audience or donations could be impacted by the windows coming out — or staying in — Hollerith said it didn’t come up as a major part of the decision process.

“If I honor Jesus’ command to love thy neighbor as thy self, and take seriously the experience of African Americans in this country, the question is: What is the right thing to do? Not to look at it in terms of funding or participation,” he said.

The cathedral’s decision comes as the country is divided by debate about its history and the place of race and religion in American identity. Also Wednesday a huge poll by the Public Religion Research Institute was released, showing white Christians continuing to shrink as a percentage of the country.

In 2017, the Episcopal Church is perhaps the most prominent face of progressive Christianity — with its leaders on the forefront of liberalizing changes on race, gender and sexuality. However its cathedral is also perhaps the most prominent example of a blending of patriotism and religion. Art all around the cathedral weaves the story of the Bible with America’s story — including that of the Civil War.

One massive window juxtaposes George Washington with King David on one side, nearby Paul Revere and D-Day paratroopers. The highest window panels soaring over the sanctuary show the Supreme Court, the White House and the U.S. Capitol.

Near the entrance is a huge vivid window called “the Agony of War,” which Eckstrom said is about the Civil War. It shows flames mixed with glass fragments of blue and gray. Engraved beneath are the words “with malice towards none.”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

US general in Afghanistan apologizes for highly offensive leaflets

September 7, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

A senior U.S. commander in Afghanistan apologized Wednesday for propaganda leaflets that superimposed a key Islamic text on the image of a dog.

The leaflets distributed by U.S. forces in Parwan province, north of Kabul, on Tuesday depicted a lion, representing the U.S.-led coalition, chasing a dog with a section of the Taliban’s banner, containing a passage from the Koran in Arabic, superimposed on its side.

Linking Islamic texts and religious beliefs with animals is a sensitive matter in the Islamic world, including Afghanistan, a country where the United States is fighting its longest anti-Islamist war and that has been the scene of bloody protests over religious issues.

Dogs are particularly offensive.

In Afghan society, many people are culturally and religiously sensitive to the issue of dogs. The animals generally are considered unclean, diseased and dangerous, and a common Afghan proverb says that if a dog is in your home, angels will not cross the doorstep. Dogs are a common sight in Afghanistan and are traditionally used for fighting, guarding and herding. The Afghan hound is considered a national treasure, although few can be found in the country anymore.

Many wealthy Afghans now import expensive breeds as a status symbol, especially German shepherds, but local or stray dogs are still widely shunned, and children often throw stones at them. Even though the American pamphlet showed a dog in connection with Taliban ­militants, who are officially the enemy of the Afghan government and people, the symbol and slogan were still considered ­offensive, creating a public ­uproar on social media and leading to the U.S. military’s hasty apology.

The Taliban in a statement Wednesday slammed the leaflets, saying they were deliberately distributed to show the United States’ “utter animosity with Islam.” Qari Mohammad Yousuf, a spokesman for the group, urged Afghans to support the militants in their war against U.S. troops to save the country and Islam.

Zabiullah Mujahid, another spokesman for the group, later said that as a move to partly avenge the leaflets, a suicide bomber conducted an attack on U.S. troops at an entrance of Bagram air base Wednesday afternoon. The coalition confirmed a blast outside the base. Without giving details, it said that the blast had caused a small number of casualties and that the injured were treated inside the base.

The base was secure, it said in a statement.

The propaganda leaflets drew stern criticism and anger among the residents of Parwan — home to Bagram, the largest U.S. military base in Afghanistan — and prompted the coalition to issue an apology Wednesday.

“The design of the leaflets mistakenly contained an image highly offensive to both Muslims and the religion of Islam. I sincerely apologize,” Maj. Gen. James Linder said in a statement.

“We have the deepest respect for Islam and our Muslim partners worldwide,” he said, promising an investigation to find out why the incident happened and to hold those responsible accountable. “Furthermore, I will make appropriate changes so this never happens again.”

Parwan’s authorities have managed to calm anger by talking to the public, officials said.

“It is a very serious violation. The people are very angry. It is a major abuse against Islam,” Mohammad Zaman Mamozai, the police chief of Parwan, said by phone.

“Why they do not understand or know our culture, our religion and history? We lost several million, became refugees, lost our country and government just because of our religion,” he said referring to the occupation of Afghanistan by the former Soviet Union in the 1980s.

Images of the leaflets also have been published on some social media sites.

“Regain your freedom from these terrorist dogs and aid the coalition forces so that they annihilate these enemies,” said the writing on the top of the leaflet.

President Ashraf Ghani’s government, which some consider a puppet of the United States, has not reacted to the distribution of the leaflets.

Parwan was the scene of days of anti-U.S. demonstrations in 2012 when copies of the Koran along with other Islamic texts were burnedat the Bagram base by U.S. troops. The U.S. military apologized at the time, saying it was a mistake and not a deliberate act.

The demonstrations turned ­violent and spread to other parts of the country.

Constable reported from Islamabad, Pakistan.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS