Thursday, December 26, 2024

Baltimore officers won’t face federal civil rights charges in Freddie Gray’s death, Justice Department concludes

September 13, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

The Justice Department has decided not to bring civil rights charges against the officers involved in the death of Freddie Gray, whose 2015 death in police custody sparked riots and widespread anger in Baltimore, authorities said Tuesday.

In a news release, the Justice Department said its investigation had found “insufficient evidence” to support charges in the case, and pointed to the high bar prosecutors would have had to meet to prove federal charges.

“It is not enough to show that the officer made a mistake, acted negligently, acted by accident, or even exercised bad judgment,” the Justice Department said. “Although Gray’s death is undeniably tragic, the evidence in this case is insufficient to meet these substantial evidentiary requirements.”

The decision likely forecloses any chance that the officers involved in Gray’s high-profile death will face criminal consequences, though the news is not particularly surprising. After a mistrial and three acquittals, Baltimore’s top prosecutor had announced she was ending local authorities’ effort to prosecute the officers, because winning a conviction had proved too difficult.

An attorney for Gray’s family declined to comment. The development was first reported by the Baltimore Sun.

Gray, 25, was arrested in West Baltimore the morning of April 12, 2015, then placed in the back of a police van with his hands cuffed behind his back and his legs shackled. As he was being transported, he suffered a severe neck injury and lost consciousness. He died in the hospital about a week later.

The death sparked violent protests in Baltimore, and Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby ultimately charged six officers involved in handling Gray with various state crimes. Meanwhile, the Justice Department launched its own criminal, civil rights investigation into Gray’s death, as well as a broader probe of possible systemic violations in the Baltimore Police Department.

Michael Davey, who represents Lt. Brian Rice, the highest-ranking officer involved in Gray’s arrest, said “We’re very pleased that the Department of Justice has come to the conclusion they did.” He said he only wished the local prosecutor had reached the same determination “prior to any of the criminal charges being placed.”

Rice, along with Officers Caesar Goodson Jr., William Porter, Edward Nero, Garrett Miller and Sgt. Alicia White, were charged with various offenses in Gray’s death, including manslaughter, assault and reckless endangerment. Goodson, who drove the van, was the sole officer charged with murder.

Mosby, on July 27, 2016, dropped criminal charges against White, Miller and Porter. Three other officers — Goodson, Rice and Nero — were found not guilty after separate trials. Porter had gone to trial once, but the proceeding ended in a mistrial.

The Justice Department said it had conducted a comprehensive, independent investigation of the events, reviewing surveillance footage, witness interviews, medical reports and other materials. Prosecutors, the Justice Department said, considered several different legal violations, “including theories of false arrest, excessive force, and deliberate indifference to the risk of serious harm to Gray.”

The investigation included an assessment of whether Gray should have been arrested in the first place, whether Goodson gave Gray a “rough ride” and an analysis of officers’ failure to seatbelt Gray, among many other things.

Even where prosecutors found some fault — Goodson, for example, made a wide right turn and crossed a double yellow line, and Gray was not buckled in per department policy — they could not substantiate criminal wrongdoing, the Justice Department said. The department said evidence “overwhelmingly contradicted reports from some civilian witnesses that Gray was either tased or beaten by the officers.”

The officers could still face professional repercussions. Davey, the attorney who represents Rice, said internal disciplinary hearings are scheduled to begin for five of the six officers in October. Porter is not facing any internal charges. The hearings are public.

The Baltimore department, too, is still broadly working to implement changes. The Justice Department during the Obama administration had found that the Baltimore police officers used excessive force and disproportionately stopped African Americans, and ultimately reached an agreement with the city to institute new policies.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, though, has taken a markedly different stance on police practices than his predecessors, and he has been particularly critical of broad, court-enforceable agreements to mandate police departments undergo change. His Justice Department tried to delay the reform agreement in Baltimore, though a judge ultimately approved it over federal authorities’ objection.

Sessions seems to be more amenable to charging individual officers with wrongdoing, though — like his predecessors — he has found that doing so is not easy under federal law. The Justice Department announced in May that it would not bring charges against the police officers involved in the death of Alton Sterling, whose fatal shooting in Baton Rouge last summer was captured on a video that rocketed around social media.

More recently, the Justice Department closed without charges its investigation into the death of 19-year-old Michael Moore, who was fatally shot by an officer in Alabama in 2016.

The Justice Department is still probing the high-profile death of Eric Garner, who died in 2014 after he was taken to the ground by New York City police officers. His death was also caught on video, sparking national outrage and helping coin the rallying cry, “I can’t breathe.”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Pope Francis wants President Trump to expand his definition of ‘pro-life’ to include protecting DACA recipients

September 12, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off


Pope Francis talks to journalists during a news conference aboard a plane flight to Rome at the end of his visit to Colombia, September 11, 2017. REUTERS/Andrew Medichini/Pool

President Trump isn’t as pro-life as he says he is if he doesn’t protect young immigrants from deportation, Pope Francis said on Monday.

Trump decided last week to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, giving Congress six months to determine the futures for about 690,000 people who arrived in the U.S. as minors.

But Pope Francis is urging the president to rethink a decision that the religious leader fears could tear families apart.

“If he is a good pro-life believer, he must understand that family is the cradle of life and one must defend its unity,” Francis said during an in-flight news conference en route to the Vatican from Colombia.

Removing children from families “isn’t something that bears fruit for either the youngsters or their families.”

“I hope they rethink it a bit,” the pope said. “Because I heard the U.S. president speak: He presents himself as a person who is pro-life.”

During the 2016 presidential campaign and before it, Trump’s position on abortion wasn’t always clear — especially during a period when he appeared to give conflicting answers to questions about the issue over a three-day period.

But since entering the White House, Trump has repeatedly shared his support for the cause of antiabortion activists. And his position is consistent with the majority of those in his party. Most Republicans — 65 percent — say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center.

Francis has become known, and praised among liberals, for consistent calls to expand what it means to be “pro-life,” a phrase usually applied narrowly to mean antiabortion. But it doesn’t appear as if the president will include protecting undocumented youth from being deported to countries that their advocates say could put them in harm’s way in his definition of “pro-life.”

The day after his DACA decision, Trump said he had “no second thoughts.”

Several religious leaders have spoken out against the Trump administration’s decision, including leadership of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“The cancellation of the DACA program is reprehensible,” they wrote. “It causes unnecessary fear for DACA youth and their families. These youth entered the U.S. as minors and often know America as their only home.”

“The Catholic Church has long watched with pride and admiration as DACA youth live out their daily lives with hope and a determination to flourish and contribute to society: continuing to work and provide for their families, continuing to serve in the military, and continuing to receive an education,” the leaders added. “Now, after months of anxiety and fear about their futures, these brave young people face deportation. This decision is unacceptable and does not reflect who we are as Americans.”

That pushback from Catholic leaders is understandable in part given the increased prominence of Latino immigrants in the U.S. Catholic church.

But not all American Catholics view that as a good thing — and some think the church is worried that Trump’s DACA decision would stem that growth, including former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon.

The Catholic Church has been “unable to really, to come to grips with the problems in the church. They need illegal aliens. They need illegal aliens to fill the churches,” Bannon said in a ”60 Minutes” interview that aired Sunday.

Latinos have represented most of the country’s Catholic population growth in recent years, with immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean reshaping the picture of Catholicism in the United States, according to Hosffman Ospino, assistant professor of theology and religious education at Boston College’s School of Theology and Ministry.

Bannon thinks the Catholic church’s support for them is rooted in financial interest.

“They have — they have an economic interest. They have an economic interest in unlimited immigration, unlimited illegal immigration,” he said.

While most Americans support DACA, most white Catholics share Bannon’s negative view of undocumented immigrants. Only 44 percent of white Catholics believe immigrants strengthen the country, according to a 2015 Public Religion Research Institute poll. The same survey found that more than 4 in 10 white Catholics say immigrants threaten traditional American customs and values. Perhaps these views are why Trump won the Catholic vote after the group chose the Democratic candidate in the two previous presidential elections.

While the pope may think he’s putting Trump in a predicament where he has to choose between being “pro-life” and anti-DACA, it appears that many of these Catholics are like Bannon in that they don’t look to the pope to shape their views on immigration or even abortion issues.

After all, more than half of American Catholics wouldn’t be “pro-life” to the pope, given their belief that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center, a position that is actually at odds with the Catholic church.

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS