Saturday, December 28, 2024

Cuba mystery grows: New details on what befell US diplomats

September 17, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

WASHINGTON — The blaring, grinding noise jolted the American diplomat from his bed in a Havana hotel. He moved just a few feet, and there was silence. He climbed back into bed. Inexplicably, the agonizing sound hit him again. It was as if he’d walked through some invisible wall cutting straight through his room.

Soon came the hearing loss, and the speech problems, symptoms both similar and altogether different from others among at least 21 U.S. victims in an astonishing international mystery still unfolding in Cuba. The top U.S. diplomat has called them “health attacks.” New details learned by The Associated Press indicate at least some of the incidents were confined to specific rooms or even parts of rooms with laser-like specificity, baffling U.S. officials who say the facts and the physics don’t add up.

“None of this has a reasonable explanation,” said Fulton Armstrong, a former CIA official who served in Havana long before America re-opened an embassy there. “It’s just mystery after mystery after mystery.”

Suspicion initially focused on a sonic weapon, and on the Cubans. Yet the diagnosis of mild brain injury, considered unlikely to result from sound, has confounded the FBI, the State Department and U.S. intelligence agencies involved in the investigation.

Some victims now have problems concentrating or recalling specific words, several officials said, the latest signs of more serious damage than the U.S. government initially realized. The United States first acknowledged the attacks in August — nine months after symptoms were first reported.

It may seem the stuff of sci-fi novels, of the cloak-and-dagger rivalries that haven’t fully dissipated despite the historic U.S.-Cuban rapprochement two years ago that seemed to bury the weight of the two nations’ Cold War enmity. But this is Cuba, the land of poisoned cigars, exploding seashells and covert subterfuge by Washington and Havana, where the unimaginable in espionage has often been all too real.

The Trump administration still hasn’t identified a culprit or a device to explain the attacks, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former U.S. officials, Cuban officials and others briefed on the investigation. Most weren’t authorized to discuss the probe and demanded anonymity.

“The investigation into all of this is still under way. It is an aggressive investigation,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said Thursday. “We will continue doing this until we find out who or what is responsible for this.”

In fact, almost nothing about what went down in Havana is clear. Investigators have tested several theories about an intentional attack — by Cuba’s government, a rogue faction of its security forces, a third country like Russia, or some combination thereof. Yet they’ve left open the possibility an advanced espionage operation went horribly awry, or that some other, less nefarious explanation is to blame.

Aside from their homes, officials said Americans were attacked in at least one hotel, a fact not previously disclosed. An incident occurred on an upper floor of the recently renovated Hotel Capri, a 60-year-old concrete tower steps from the Malecon, Havana’s iconic, waterside promenade.

The cases vary deeply: different symptoms, different recollections of what happened. That’s what makes the puzzle so difficult to crack.

In several episodes recounted by U.S. officials, victims knew it was happening in real time, and there were strong indications of a sonic attack.

Some felt vibrations, and heard sounds — loud ringing or a high-pitch chirping similar to crickets or cicadas. Others heard the grinding noise. Some victims awoke with ringing in their ears and fumbled for their alarm clocks, only to discover the ringing stopped when they moved away from their beds.

The attacks seemed to come at night. Several victims reported they came in minute-long bursts.

Yet others heard nothing, felt nothing. Later, their symptoms came.

The scope keeps widening. On Tuesday, the State Department disclosed that doctors had confirmed another two cases, bringing the total American victims to 21. Some have mild traumatic brain injury, known as a concussion, and others permanent hearing loss.

Even the potential motive is unclear. Investigators are at a loss to explain why Canadians were harmed, too, including some who reported nosebleeds. Fewer than 10 Canadian diplomatic households in Cuba were affected, a Canadian official said. Unlike the U.S., Canada has maintained warm ties to Cuba for decades.

Sound and health experts are equally baffled. Targeted, localized beams of sound are possible, but the laws of acoustics suggest such a device would probably be large and not easily concealed. Officials said it’s unclear whether the device’s effects were localized by design or due to some other technical factor.

And no single, sonic gadget seems to explain such an odd, inconsistent array of physical responses.

“Brain damage and concussions, it’s not possible,” said Joseph Pompei, a former MIT researcher and psychoacoustics expert. “Somebody would have to submerge their head into a pool lined with very powerful ultrasound transducers.”

Other symptoms have included brain swelling, dizziness, nausea, severe headaches, balance problems and tinnitus, or prolonged ringing in the ears. Many victims have shown improvement since leaving Cuba and some suffered only minor or temporary symptoms.

After the U.S. complained to Cuba’s government earlier this year and Canada detected its own cases, the FBI and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police traveled to Havana to investigate.

FBI investigators swept the rooms, looking for devices. They found nothing, several officials briefed on the investigation said.

In May, Washington expelled two Cuban diplomats to protest the communist government’s failure to protect Americans serving there. But the U.S. has taken pains not to accuse Havana of perpetrating the attacks. It’s a sign investigators believe that even if elements of Cuba’s security forces were involved, it wasn’t necessarily directed from the top.

Cuba’s government declined to answer specific questions about the incidents, pointing to a previous Foreign Affairs Ministry statement denying any involvement, vowing full cooperation and saying it was treating the situation “with utmost importance.”

“Cuba has never, nor would it ever, allow that the Cuban territory be used for any action against accredited diplomatic agents or their families, without exception,” the Cuban statement said.

After half a century of estrangement, the U.S. and Cuba in 2015 restored diplomatic ties between countries separated by a mere 90 miles of water. Embassies were re-opened and restrictions on travel and commerce eased. President Donald Trump has reversed some of those changes, but left others in place.

Mark Feierstein, who oversaw the Cuba detente on President Barack Obama’s National Security Council, noted that Cuban authorities have been uncharacteristically cooperative with the investigation.

If the Trump administration felt confident Raul Castro’s government was to blame, it’s likely the U.S. would have already taken major punitive steps, like shuttering the newly re-established American Embassy. And the U.S. hasn’t stopped sending new diplomats to Cuba even as the victim list grows.

“Had they thought the Cuban government was deliberately attacking American diplomats, that would have had a much more negative effect,” Feierstein said. “We haven’t seen that yet.”

___

Weissenstein reported from Havana. Associated Press writers Bradley Klapper, Eric Tucker and Lauran Neergaard in Washington, Rob Gillies in Toronto and Jake Pearson in New York contributed.

EDITOR’S NOTE _ One in a series of stories.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Mueller just obtained a warrant that could change the entire nature of the Russia investigation

September 17, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off


  • robert mueller
    Robert
    Mueller.

    Thomson
    Reuters


    Robert Mueller obtained a search warrant for records
    of “inauthentic” Facebook accounts

  • It’s bad news for Russian election interference
    “deniers”
  • Mueller may be looking to charge specific foreign
    entities with a crime

FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller reportedly obtained a search
warrant for records of the “inauthentic” accounts Facebook shut
down earlier this month and the targeted ads these accounts
purchased during the 2016 election. 

The warrant was first disclosed by the Wall Street Journal
on Friday night and the news was later confirmed by CNN.

Legal experts say the revelation has enormous implications for
the trajectory of Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s
election interference, and whether Moscow had any help from
President Donald Trump’s campaign team.

“This is big news — and potentially bad news for the
Russian election interference ‘deniers,’” said Asha Rangappa,
a former FBI counterintelligence agent.

Rangappa, now an associate dean at Yale Law School,
explained that to obtain a search warrant a prosecutor needs to
prove to a judge that there is reason to believe a crime has been
committed. The prosecutor then has to show that the information
being sought will provide evidence of that crime.

Mueller would not have sought a warrant targeting Facebook
as a company, Rangappa noted. Rather, he would have been
interested in learning more about specific accounts. 

“The key here, though, is that Mueller clearly already has
enough information on these accounts — and their link to a
potential crime to justify forcing [Facebook] to give
up the info,” she said. “That means that he has uncovered a great
deal of evidence through other avenues of Russian election
interference.”

It also means that Mueller is no longer looking
at Russia’s election interference from a strict
counterintelligence standpoint — rather, he now believes he may
be able to obtain enough evidence to charge specific foreign
entities with a crime.

Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti, now
a partner at Thompson Coburn LLP, said that the
revelation
Mueller obtained a search warrant for Facebook
content ”may be the biggest news in the case since the
Manafort raid.”

The FBI conducted a predawn
July raid on the home
 of Trump’s former campaign
chairman, Paul Manafort, in late July. The bureau is
reportedly
investigating
Manafort’s financial history and overseas
business dealings as part of its probe into possible collusion
between the campaign and Moscow.


jared kushner
White
House senior adviser Jared Kushner listens as President Donald
Trump answer questions regarding the ongoing situation in North
Korea, Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, at Trump National Golf Club in
Bedminster, N.J.

Associated
Press/Pablo Martinez Monsivais


The Facebook warrant “means that Mueller has concluded that
specific foreign individuals committed a crime by making a
‘contribution’ in connection with an election,” Mariotti
wrote on Saturday.

“It also means that he has evidence of that crime that
convinced a federal magistrate judge of two things: f
irst,
that there was good reason to believe that the foreign individual
committed the crime. Second, that evidence of the crime
existed on Facebook.”

That has implications for Trump and his associates, too,
Mariotti said. 

“It is a crime to know that a crime is taking place and to
help it succeed. That’s aiding and abetting. If any Trump
associate knew about the foreign contributions that Mueller’s
search warrant focused on and helped that effort in a tangible
way, they could be charged.”

Congressional intelligence committees are homing in on the
campaign’s data operation as a potential trove of incriminating
information.

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking member
of the House Intelligence Committee, told MSNBC earlier
this month that he wants to know how sophisticated the
Russian-bought ads were — in terms of their content and targets —
to determine whether they had any help from the Trump campaign.

The House Intelligence Committee also wants to
interview
the digital director for Trump’s campaign, Brad
Parscale, who worked closely with Trump’s son-in-law Jared
Kushner.

Kushner was put in charge of the campaign’s entire data
operation and is

 now being
scrutinized by the FBI
 over his contacts with Russia’s
ambassador and the CEO of a sanctioned Russian bank in
December.

Facebook said in its initial statement that about
25% of the ads purchased by Russians during the election “were
geographically targeted,” and many analysts have found it
difficult to believe that foreign entities would have had
the kind of granular knowledge of American politics necessary to
target specific demographics and voting precincts.

In a post-election interview,
Kushner told Forbes that
he had been keenly interested in Facebook’s “micro-targeting”
capabilities from early on.

“I called somebody who works for one of the technology
companies that I work with, and I had them give me a tutorial on
how to use Facebook micro-targeting,” Kushner said.

“We brought in Cambridge Analytica,” he continued. “I
called some of my friends from Silicon Valley who were some of
the best digital marketers in the world, a

nd I asked
them how to scale this stuff . . . We basically had to build a
$400 million operation with 1,500 people operating in 50 states,
in five months to then be taken apart. We started really from
scratch.”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS