You are here:
Home / Choosing Lingerie
White House press secretary Sean Spicer speaks to reporters during a news briefing at the White House in June. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Following his surprise performance at the Emmys on Sunday, former White House press secretary Sean Spicer said he “absolutely” regrets his infamous assertion in January that the crowd size at Trump’s inauguration was the largest there had ever been.
“Of course I do, absolutely,” Spicer told the New York Times on Monday.
Spicer’s demonstrably false claim, which he delivered during his first statement to the media, came with a lecture for journalists who he said were intentionally misrepresenting the crowd size to show that Obama’s inauguration drew more people.
“This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration — period — both in person and around the globe,” he said. “These attempts to lessen the enthusiasm of the inauguration are shameful and wrong,” he added, taking no questions from reporters after reading the five-minute statement.
The Washington Post’s Fact Checker gave Spicer four pinocchios.
[The former Soviet officer who trusted his gut — and averted a global nuclear catastrophe]
Spicer’s falsehood-riddled rebuke of the media set the tone for his six-month tenure as press secretary. Other officials in the Trump administration have also seen their reputations come under fire repeatedly for providing false or misleading information.
Spicer would repeatedly clash with journalists until he resigned after President Trump appointed Anthony Scaramucci as communications director.
Now, Spicer is trying to repair his image.
Before he became one of the most well-known figures in the Trump administration — and one of late-night television’s favorite targets — Spicer enjoyed a good relationship with the media as the longest-serving communications director for the Republican National Committee. Following his resignation, he has made the rounds on the speaking and television circuit in an apparent effort to earn that back.
During an appearance last week on ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” late-night show, he basically admitted that he lied for the president, saying it was his job to say whatever Trump told him to say.
“Look, your job as press secretary is to represent the president’s voice and to make sure that you are articulating what he believes, [what] his vision is on policy, on issues and on other areas that he wants to articulate,” said Spicer, who will join the Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics as a visiting fellow for the new academic year. “Whether or not you agree or not isn’t your job.”
But his interview on Monday was the first time Spicer admitted that he regretted his memorable briefing-room debut.
[A father put on a clown mask to punish his 6-year-old. Now he’s charged with inducing panic.]
Spicer also told the New York Times that he hopes the president was not offended by his skit at the Emmys, in which Spicer joined host Stephen Colbert on stage on a rolling podium. “This will be the largest audience to witness an Emmys, period, both in person and around the world!” Spicer announced, over the cheers of the Emmy attendees.
Asked if he was throwing Trump under the bus, Spicer told The Washington Post’s Emily Yahr that the surprise onstage appearance “was an attempt for me to poke a little fun at myself and bring some levity to the situation.”
The performance was met with a grin from Melissa McCarthy, who impersonated Spicer on “Saturday Night Live,” a gasp from “Veep” star Anna Chlumsky and a laugh from Kevin Spacey of “House of Cards.”
But many critics on Twitter were less pleased than those in Hollywood.
“Seeing Sean Spicer at the #Emmys trying to renew himself after him offering his services to a bigoted, sexist, racist agenda is insulting,” singer Ricky Davila tweeted.
Many viewed his appearance as an attempt to “normalize” a public figure who repeatedly and largely unrepentantly lied on behalf of Trump.
And others pointed out that two months ago, Spicer told Fox New’s Sean Hannity that he had “no regrets.”
On Kimmel’s show on Wednesday, Spicer made a joke when Kimmel asked whether crowd size was what Spicer had wanted to talk about.
“If it was up to me, I would have probably worn a different suit,” he said.
Read more:
Category 5 Hurricane Maria is a severe threat to the Caribbean and Puerto Rico; Jose to scrape Northeast coast
Trump lawyers spill beans, thanks to terrible choice of restaurant — next door to the New York Times
Share and Enjoy
Stanislav Petrov, a former Soviet military officer, poses at his home in 2015 near Moscow. In 1983, he was on duty when the Soviet Union’s early warning satellite indicated the U.S. had fired nuclear weapons at his country. He suspected, correctly, it was a false alarm and did not immediately send the report up the chain of command. Petrov died at age 77.
Pavel Golovkin/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Pavel Golovkin/AP
Stanislav Petrov, a former Soviet military officer, poses at his home in 2015 near Moscow. In 1983, he was on duty when the Soviet Union’s early warning satellite indicated the U.S. had fired nuclear weapons at his country. He suspected, correctly, it was a false alarm and did not immediately send the report up the chain of command. Petrov died at age 77.
Pavel Golovkin/AP
Stanislav Petrov was a lieutenant colonel in the Soviet Union’s Air Defense Forces, and his job was to monitor his country’s satellite system, which was looking for any possible nuclear weapons launches by the United States.
He was on the overnight shift in the early morning hours of Sept. 26, 1983, when the computers sounded an alarm, indicating that the U.S. had launched five nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles.
“The siren howled, but I just sat there for a few seconds, staring at the big, back-lit, red screen with the word ‘launch’ on it,” Petrov told the BBC in 2013.
It was already a moment of extreme tension in the Cold War. On Sept. 1 of that year, the Soviet Union shot down a Korean Air Lines plane that had drifted into Soviet airspace, killing all 269 people on board, including a U.S. congressman. The episode led the U.S. and the Soviets to exchange warnings and threats.
Petrov had to act quickly. U.S. missiles could reach the Soviet Union in just over 20 minutes.
“There was no rule about how long we were allowed to think before we reported a strike,” Petrov told the BBC. “But we knew that every second of procrastination took away valuable time, that the Soviet Union’s military and political leadership needed to be informed without delay. All I had to do was to reach for the phone; to raise the direct line to our top commanders — but I couldn’t move. I felt like I was sitting on a hot frying pan.”
Petrov sensed something wasn’t adding up.
He had been trained to expect an all-out nuclear assault from the U.S., so it seemed strange that the satellite system was detecting only a few missiles being launched. And the system itself was fairly new. He didn’t completely trust it.
Arms control expert Jeffrey Lewis recalled the episode in an interview last December on NPR:
“[Petrov] just had this feeling in his gut that it wasn’t right. It was five missiles. It didn’t seem like enough. So even though by all of the protocols he had been trained to follow, he should absolutely have reported that up the chain of command and, you know, we should be talking about the great nuclear war of 1983 if any of us survived.”
After several nerve-jangling minutes, Petrov didn’t send the computer warning to his superiors. He checked to see if there had been a computer malfunction.
He had guessed correctly.
“Twenty-three minutes later I realized that nothing had happened,” he said in 2013. “If there had been a real strike, then I would already know about it. It was such a relief.”
That episode and the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis are considered to be the closest the U.S. and the Soviets came to a nuclear exchange. And while the Cuban Missile Crisis has been widely examined, Petrov’s actions have received much less attention.
Petrov died on May 19, at age 77, in a suburb outside Moscow, according to news reports Monday. He had long since retired and was living alone. News of his death apparently went unrecognized at the time.
Karl Schumacher, a German political activist who had highlighted Petrov’s actions in recent years, tried to contact Petrov earlier this month to wish him a happy birthday. Instead, he reached Petrov’s son, Dmitri, who said his father had died in May.
Petrov said he received an official reprimand for making mistakes in his logbook on Sept. 26, 1983.
His story was not publicized at the time, but it did emerge after the Soviet Union collapsed. He received a number of international awards during the final years of his life. In 2015, a docudrama about him featuring Kevin Costner was called The Man Who Saved The World.
But he never considered himself a hero.
“That was my job,” he said. “But they were lucky it was me on shift that night.”
Greg Myre is a national security correspondent. Follow him @gregmyre1.
Share and Enjoy