At Tehama vigil, tears, cheers and a reminder: ‘Please, please report everybody who shoots’
November 16, 2017 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
Tears for those who were killed or hurt, applause for the schoolteachers who saved lives and loud cheers for the strength of their small rural enclave filled the community hall here Wednesday night.
But some interjected a strong message into the vigil marking Tuesday’s shooting spree: Don’t ignore the gunshots.
Martha Monroy lives in the neighborhood where gunman Kevin Neal drove through twice on Tuesday, hunting victims. She was among the residents to pick up the microphone and call for less tolerance of backyard gunfire.
Neal had a history of complaints for firing guns from his home on Bobcat Lane, despite a court order since March banning him from having firearms.
On Tuesday he went on a rampage, killing four residents and wounding at least 10 more, before he died in a shootout with police. Later, officers discovered the body of his wife beneath the floor of their home.
“When somebody shoots, please, please report everybody who shoots,” Monroy pleaded when it was her turn to speak. “Call the police, please. Nobody has the right to shoot nobody.”
Hers was a touchy point, even at the vigil. Another speaker picked up the passing microphone to interject: “It’s not the gun, it’s the person.”
A man who introduced himself as Rob said the shooter and his wife once lived near him in another part of Rancho Tehama.
“Kevin and Barb used to be my neighbors,” he said, his voice breaking. Authorities have not named Neal’s wife. “I didn’t notice anything strange like that. And I feel Barbara was caught up in it, and she got shot.”
Rob voiced remorse over the unheeded reports of nightly gunfire at Neal’s house.
“There was shooting every night. There should have been something done,” he said, to murmurs of agreement.
“There were shots every night, and I never knew it was him,” he said, wishing aloud that he had realized it was Neal. “I could have stopped him.”
There were prayers said by the more than 100 community members who crowded in the small hall to capacity, standing shoulder to shoulder. But some still needed to recount their personal brushes with the violence of the day before.
They included a father who had dropped his child off at Tehama Elementary School and found himself barricaded inside when the gunman tried to get in.
When he tried to look out a window, he drew gunfire. He found himself moving children huddled beneath their desks to safer places, including a 6-year-old hit by the gunfire. At the vigil, he met the family of that boy and they hugged, sobbing in gratitude for one another.
Against the back wall sat Anelina Sanchez, quietly struggling to come to terms with her own contact with the shooter. She had stepped out of her house that morning on Fawn Lane, not far from where the gunman had killed his wife and three others. She saw a man in a car who shouted out his window at her in anger.
“He’s asking me, ‘Do you know somebody killed over here in the Rancho?’ And I say, ‘No, who it was?’ ” Sanchez said, “and he is taking the gun out and he said, ‘That’s me.’ And he shot five times.”
Sanchez said she dropped to the ground behind her neighbor’s fence and crawled back into the house. Officers later found the bullets that had missed her. But before then, she said, she had to deal with the sight of a car off Oak Park Road, its windows blown out, the passengers bleeding. And the story her daughter brought home of being fired at in her car as the gunman passed by.
“I am so scared. I am so scared of anything,” Sanchez said. “If somebody said stop, I will go faster, because I am so scared…
“Even last night, I couldn’t sleep.”
paige.stjohn@latimes.com
Twitter: @paigestjohn
Share and Enjoy
Australians Say ‘Yes’ to Same-Sex Marriage, Clearing Path for Legalization
November 15, 2017 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
“This is our proudest moment as gay and lesbian Australians,” said Chris Lewis, 60, an artist from Sydney, who waved a large rainbow flag he bought in San Francisco about 30 years ago. “Finally I can be proud of my country.”
But many Australians said it was also late in coming.
Annika Lowry, 42, who brought her 4-year-old daughter to the celebration, said the vote revealed a widening gap between Australia’s political class and voters who have been demanding same-sex marriage legislation for years.
“It was not just about us,” she said. “It’s for our kids, so that they know equality is important.”
Alex Greenwich, a state lawmaker from New South Wales and the co-chairman of Australian Marriage Equality, an advocacy group, said the vote “shows that Australians have truly come together in support of their gay and lesbian mates and have said that everybody should be able to have the freedom to marry.”
In calling for the national survey, Mr. Turnbull sought public backing for a shift in social policy that was opposed by many members of his center-right Liberal Party.
Mr. Turnbull voted yes, and he urged other Australians to do so as a matter of fairness, seeking to blunt opposition from far-right members of his party.
Lucy and I are voting YES because it’s fair. Make sure you have your say too by returning your survey form. pic.twitter.com/6xhaDYC7pQ
—
Malcolm Turnbull (@TurnbullMalcolm)
Sept. 23, 2017
“My commitment was to give every Australian their say,” Mr. Turnbull said after the results were announced. “That has been done, they have spoken.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
He added: “Now it is up to us, here in the Parliament of Australia, to get on with it — to get on with the job the Australian people have tasked us to do, and get this done, this year, before Christmas.”
Dean Smith, a federal senator from the Liberal Party, who is gay, said that he would immediately introduce a bill to legalize same-sex marriage. He said on Tuesday that he believed he had the votes to pass the legislation in the Senate and send it to Parliament’s lower house for approval.
Lyle Shelton, a Christian lobbyist who was the “no” campaign’s most outspoken advocate, said he would begrudgingly “accept the democratic decision.”
“Millions of Australians will always believe the truth about marriage, that it’s between one man and one woman,” Mr. Shelton said. “It could take years, if not decades, to win that back.”
The record of subjecting same-sex marriage to a public vote remains mixed.
In 2015, Ireland was the first country to legalize same-sex marriage by referendum, but the same year, voters in Slovenia rejected a law legalizing such unions.
Credit
Saeed Khan/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
In the United States, numerous states outlawed same-sex marriage in referendums; in 2012, Maine, Maryland and Washington became the first states to legalize such unions by referendum. The United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage across the nation in 2015.
The survey in Australia was controversial, not only because it placed such a thorny issue at the whims of direct democracy but also because of its cost.
As the deadline approached for citizens to mail in their ballots, passions were inflamed by heartfelt pleas and vitriolic attacks.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Many supporters of same-sex marriage opposed the survey, saying that human rights should not be a matter for an up-or-down vote and urging Parliament to decide the matter.
Estimates put the cost of the survey around 122 million Australian dollars, or $97 million. The poll was not a legally required step for changing the law.
Activists in September challenged the survey’s legality, arguing that it was an unconstitutional use of tax money, but Australia’s High Court allowed the poll to proceed. In the end, the response rate was higher than supporters of same-sex marriage anticipated, showing both frustration with parliamentary inaction and the extent to which mainstream opinion has shifted in support of sexual minorities.
Although legalization is not guaranteed, the results announced on Wednesday make the country’s path to same-sex marriage much clearer.
Mr. Greenwich said the outcome delivered “an unequivocal mandate for Parliament to legislate for this bill as soon as possible for a fair bill this year.”
Focus has already shifted to that bill, and what form it will take.
“After a cost of 122 million, and over two months of campaigning and years of public discussion, it makes no sense to delay a parliamentary debate,” Mr. Smith, the Liberal senator, said in an interview. “Australians upheld their end of the bargain by voting en masse. Now it’s time for Parliament to uphold its end of the same deal.”
Mr. Smith’s bill provides for some religious protections and allows members of the clergy to refuse to solemnize marriages that conflict with their beliefs.
“That bill is obviously manifestly inadequate,” said Mr. Shelton, the opponent of same-sex marriage, who added that it focused on wedding ceremonies. “The ‘yes’ side should make good on its promise that no one else’s freedoms would be affected. They’ve maintained this all along. They’ve said that our concerns about freedom of speech and freedom of religion are red herrings.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Shelton said Mr. Smith’s bill would affect Muslim and Christian schools that wish to teach that marriage is between one man and one woman. “We’re worried about bakers and florists being taken to court, as has occurred in the United States,” he added.
An alternative bill, proposed by another Liberal Party senator, James Paterson, has more robust religious protections. His bill would allow service providers like bakers and photographers to refuse service to same-sex couples, without facing legal action. His bill would provide additional anti-discrimination protections for religious people and businesses opposed to gay marriage. Reflecting the national debate that often centered on the well-being of children, Mr. Paterson’s bill would allow parents the right to take their children out of classes that “conflict with their values.”
However, within hours of the survey’s result being revealed, Mr. Paterson took to Facebook to announce that he would be working on Mr. Smith’s bill.
“It is clear the majority of senators believe my colleague Senator Dean Smith’s bill is where we should start,” Mr. Paterson wrote.
In the dwindling days of the campaign — with “yes” looking more and more likely to prevail — many conservatives on the opposing side pushed for Mr. Paterson’s bill, saying that it provided the best protections for free speech and religion. But Mr. Turnbull said he did not believe Mr. Paterson’s bill could pass Parliament. “I don’t believe Australians would welcome, and certainly the government would not countenance, making legal discrimination that is illegal, that is unlawful, today.”
At least seven members of Australia’s Parliament have publicly committed to voting against any bill to legalize same-sex marriage, according to a report from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Most lawmakers, however, said they would support such a bill.
“There’s no denying that this has been tough for many people. This has been a campaign which has gone on for more than 10 years,” said Mr. Greenwich, the same-sex marriage advocate. “This result is a reflection of the leadership that’s been shown by everyday Australians during this campaign. It shows that Australians truly did have the opportunity to shape our nation as a fairer and more equal place.”
Continue reading the main story