Paul Ryan says Democratic leaders are threatening to take away all benefits from tax reform law

On “tax day,” U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan trumpeted what he said are some of the benefits — in addition to lower taxes — of the GOP tax reform signed into law in December 2017: Pay raises and bonuses for workers, and companies creating more jobs and bringing home money from overseas.

Then the Wisconsin Republican, speaking at an April 17, 2018 news conference, made an attack, saying:

Yet, Democratic leaders are still out there spreading doom and gloom. They call it crumbs. They talk about a dark cloud. And they are promising to take it all away.

Are they?

Pelosi comments

1. To back Ryan’s statement, his campaign staff cited an April 2018 website posting about Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader in the House. It carried this headline: “Pelosi: Democrats Will Repeal the GOP Tax Law When We Retake the House.”

But in the video clip that accompanies the article, Pelosi wasn’t that explicit.

Pelosi had been asked at a town hall meeting if Democrats win control of the House in the November 2018 elections, “will you rewrite the tax bill from scratch, or focus on reversing specific components?” She replied:

We’ll sit down at the table and say, What would be a tax bill that creates growth, that creates good-paying jobs, as it reduces the deficit?…We can do that, we must do that, in a bipartisan way. It’s not about chipping at this piece or that piece, it’s about a comprehensive look at what our tax policy should be for the future.

So, Pelosi said she would be willing to work with Republicans on overhauling, or overturning the law, in an unspecified way.

2. Two months earlier, Pelosi did use the word repeal in speaking about Democrats retaking control of the House. But she appeared to be joking, and also spoke of a bipartisan effort.

She was asked at a news conference: “You spoke earlier this week about how, if Democrats take back Congress, that you would want to work on a fair tax system. Tell us a little bit more about what you mean. Is that basically like a repeal and replace of the new tax law?”

Pelosi replied:

Well, it may have to be a replace and repeal (chuckles). Replace them (Republicans) and repeal the bill. No, (Rep. Joe Crowley) and Congresswoman Sanchez, they’re on the Ways and Means Committee and I’m going to defer to them on this. But we’ve always said, you can’t do this tax bill without having it being bipartisan. We want to recognize that perhaps we should lower the corporate rate; maybe that’s so, maybe not, what’s the case for it. But if you’re going to have sustainability in a tax reform, it has to be bipartisan.

3. Pelosi’s office, responding to Ryan’s claim, cited a Pelosi statement from a March 2018 news conference as being representative of what she has said on the subject.

After repeatedly calling the GOP reform a “tax scam” for helping the rich more than the middle class, she said:

We would have bipartisan, open hearings on how we go forward.  What’s the appropriate level of a corporate tax cut? How do we first and foremost empower financially the middle class and make that permanent, not treat them as second class people in our country?  Because we said for corporations it’s a permanent tax cut, for people it’s not permanent. And, again, it would be unifying. Unifying. It would be bipartisan, open, transparent, and unifying as we go forward to strengthen middle class tax cuts and to do so in a way that creates good paying jobs, promotes growth and reduces the deficit.

So, Pelosi has talked about a comprehensive review of taxes and alluded to repealing the GOP tax reform law.

But she has also talked about a corporate tax rate lower than what it was before the reform, and about maintaining tax breaks for the middle class.

Schumer comments

We also reviewed the statements of the Democratic leader in the Senate, Chuck Schumer of New York.

1. At a March 2018 news conference about Democrats’ proposals for infrastructure projects, Schumer spoke about reversing only certain GOP tax reforms, saying:

Rather than cutting existing infrastructure projects to pay for a paltry program, we want to roll back the Republican tax giveaways to big corporations and the wealthy, and invest that money instead in job-creating infrastructure.

2. Schumer had gone further shortly after the tax bill’s passage, telling reporters, according to The Hill:

There are probably a small number of provisions we might not repeal. It certainly would need drastic overhaul aiming it at the middle class, not the wealthy and powerful.

3. But Schumer’s office told us Democrats only want to roll back provisions for the wealthy and some of those for corporations — but leave intact tax cuts for workers and the middle class.

A summary of the Democrats’ infrastructure proposal would, among other things, restore the top individual tax rate and the estate tax to what they were before the GOP tax reform law, and put the corporate tax rate at 25 percent, up from 21 percent under the GOP law.

Schumer emphasized the GOP tax cuts for the rich in saying about the Democratic alternative:

We want to roll back the Republican tax giveaways to big corporations and the wealthy and invest that money instead in job-creating infrastructure.

So, like Pelosi, Schumer has spoken about resetting the corporate tax rate to lower than it had been before the GOP reform law, but higher than where the reform law put it. Schumer’s emphasis has been on reversing tax breaks for the rich, not for scrapping the entire reform law.

Another leader

Ryan’s office also pointed out “tax day” remarks by U.S. Rep. Joe Crowley of New York, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. He didn’t threaten repeal of the GOP tax reform, but called on Republicans to do so, saying:

The Republican caucus needs to announce that it will repeal and replace this bill. This is the bill that needs to be repealed and replaced. They are focused on health care. Repeal this bill, my Republican colleagues.

Our rating

Ryan says that on the tax reform law, Democratic leaders “are promising to take it all away.”

Democratic leaders in Congress have been harshly critical of the law, and have talked about the need to repeal or at least review most of it. But the tax reform law also provides tax benefits to the middle class, which the Democratic leaders have indicated they want to keep.

For a statement that is partially accurate, our rating is Half True.

Share and Enjoy

Michelle Wolf’s Old Late-Night Bosses Come to Her Defense

Photo

Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night’s highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. If you’re interested in hearing from The Times regularly about great TV, sign up for our Watching newsletter and get recommendations straight to your inbox.

Filthy and Mean

The comedian Michelle Wolf has worked on both “The Daily Show” and “Late Night,” so Trevor Noah and Seth Meyers were not surprised by the rough-riding, profane speech she gave at the White House correspondents’ dinner on Saturday.

The speech has drawn criticism for its unapologetic attacks on President Trump and, in particular, jokes involving Sarah Huckabee Sanders’s makeup (Wolf said her eye shadow was made of “burnt facts”).

Noah and Meyers saw little cause for outrage — especially given Trump’s own history of commenting crudely on women’s appearances — and they swept to Ms. Wolf’s defense on Monday.

“She is filthy and she is mean — which is what we love about her. Because those are wonderful qualities for comedians, and terrible qualities for free-world leaders.” — SETH MEYERS, comparing Michelle Wolf with President Trump

“Michelle should have had the decency not to comment on women’s appearances in any way, shape or form. She’s a comedian, for God’s sake, not the president.” — TREVOR NOAH

Noah feigned anger at Wolf — who left “The Daily Show” months ago to host her own program on Netflix — and told her that she was retroactively “fired.”

“I agree completely with President Trump and his team: Comedians should be held to a higher standard than he is. Which is why even though Michelle Wolf left for her new show four months ago, tonight I’m announcing that I’m officially firing her. You hear that, Michelle? You’re fired!” — TREVOR NOAH

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

‘Not in the Spirit’

Meyers was especially bothered by the fact that the White House Correspondents’ Association, which hired Wolf for the evening, put out a statement denouncing Wolf. It said her statements were “not in the spirit” of the event.

“You hired her! That’s like a parent sending an email saying, ‘Yesterday’s birthday was meant to celebrate Kevin turning 6 years old. Unfortunately the stripper’s dance routine was not in the spirit of the party.’” — SETH MEYERS

Continue reading the main story

Share and Enjoy