Monday, October 21, 2024

White supremacist is guilty in Charlottesville parking garage beating of black man

May 2, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

One of the white supremacists who viciously beat a black man inside a parking garage during last year’s “Unite the Right” rally here was found guilty Tuesday night of malicious wounding.

Jacob Scott Goodwin, 23, who wore a military tactical helmet and brandished a large shield during the Aug. 12 attack against DeAndre Harris, was convicted by a jury of nine women and three men.

The jury recommended a sentence of ten years, with the option of suspending some of the time and a $20,000 fine. The presiding judge, Richard E. Moore, will set the sentence on Aug. 23. When the court clerk read the jury’s recommendation, Goodwin’s mother let out a loud gasp.

The assault on Harris, 20, a former special education instructional assistant, was so ferocious that he suffered a spinal injury, a broken arm and head lacerations that required eight staples.

Online footage of the beating has been viewed online tens of thousands of times and attracted a group of online sleuths, led by Black Lives Matter activist Shaun King. They tracked down the alleged perpetrators’ identities, including that of Goodwin, who lives in Ward, Ark. Goodwin was arrested about two months after the rally.

Goodwin’s attorney, Elmer Woodard, argued Harris, then working as a YMCA camp counselor, came to pick a fight and that his client was just trying to defend himself.

“[Goodwin] came to exercise free speech. Mr. Harris went to abuse free speech — not to exercise it, but abuse it,” Woodward said in his opening statement.

He said it was Harris who went after Goodwin. Goodwin kicked Harris on the ground to defend himself and the other white supremacists in the garage.

Jacob Scott Goodwin, of Ward, Ark., after his arrest. (Lonoke County Sheriff’s Office)

But Nina-Alice Antony, an assistant commonwealth’s attorney, said it was Goodwin who wanted to square off.

“He was outfitted for battle,” she told the jury. “He’s got large goggles, boots. He’s got a full body shield.”

The attack inside the Market Street parking garage, next to the Charlottesville Police Department, was one of several disturbing acts of violence during the rally, which was held to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E Lee from a city park. A self-professed neo-Nazi rammed his Dodge Charger into a crowd of people that day, killing 32-year-old counterprotester Heather D. Heyer, a paralegal.

Videos of the parking garage attack on Harris — and of its preceding moments — have been scrutinized frame by frame by Harris’s defenders and white nationalists, each side arguing over one sticking point: Was Harris a victim or an instigator?

Harris was acquitted in March of misdemeanor assault and battery against one of the white supremacists involved in the confrontation.

Nevertheless, much of Goodwin’s trial centered on whether Harris sparked the fight himself by striking a prominent white nationalist in the head with a flashlight. Seconds before Harris ran into the garage shortly after 11 a.m. that day, he was standing at its entrance. He saw a fellow counterprotester being speared in the abdomen with a flagpole by Harold Crews, the North Carolina state chairman of the white-nationalist group League of the South. To protect his friend, Harris swung a flashlight at the flagpole, trying to knock it away.

Seconds after the fight with Crews, Harris rushed inside the parking garage, where he was pummeled.

When Goodwin took the stand, he told the jury he’d seen Harris assault Crews and then saw Harris charging toward him. He testified that he was scared.

“I thought he was a hostile . . . to be honest, I was terrified,” Goodwin said, who added that he thought he could have died and that “I’d probably perish or be sent to the hospital and be terribly hurt.”

He said he engaged in self-defense and felt he had only one choice, which was to kick Harris four times while Harris was falling down on the garage floor and scrambling to get back up multiple times.

“I was trying to neutralize a threat,” Goodwin said.

For the entire trial, neither the prosecutors nor the defense attorney questioned Goodwin about his possible affiliation with any white-supremacist groups. At the rally, Goodwin wore two pins, one bearing the number 88, a code for “Heil Hitler,” and a second with the logo of the Traditionalist Worker Party, a white-nationalist group.

But during his closing arguments, Woodard suddenly raised the issue. “They want you to convict this man because he’s white, and DeAndre is a black man,” he told the jury.

The comment drew an objection from Antony, who told the judge she deliberately avoided making the case about race.

In her closing arguments, Antony showed the jury a photo of Goodwin dressed in a helmet and goggles and reminded them he was clasping a large plastic shield.

She told jurors that they had to ask whether themselves if it was “reasonable” for Goodwin, dressed as he was, to be scared.

“Does Jacob Goodwin see someone over there and go help? Or does he outfit himself for battle and run in to do battle?” she asked jurors. “At no point does Mr. Goodwin break away.”

Antony argued that Goodwin’s kicks to Harris’s backside, rib cage and stomach could have killed, maimed or disabled Harris, elements necessary for the malicious-wounding charge.

But Woodard said Harris’s major injuries involved his head and that the kicks didn’t amount to malicious wounding or even assault and battery. Goodwin, he said repeatedly, feared for his life and was defending himself.

Harris, who was sitting in the courtroom pews listening to the arguments, looked distraught for much of the trial and at one point asked the prosecutor for a tissue while in the witness seat.

The jury watched multiple videos of the attack from different vantage points showing Goodwin hitting Harris with a shield and kicking him while he was on the ground. Other men join in, hitting Harris with a board and a large pole. When Harris managed to get up, they yelled obscenities at him, telling him, “Get out!”

Three other men have been also been arrested in connection to the attack on charges ranging from felonious assault to malicious wounding: Alex Michael Ramos of Georgia, whose trial is scheduled to begin Wednesday; and Daniel Borden of Ohio and Tyler Watkins Davis of Florida, who face trials this summer.

Read more:

The shadow of an assassinated American Nazi commander hangs over Charlottesville

Neo-Nazis rallied around Jefferson’s statue. But it was a Jewish family that saved Monticello.

Antifa: Guardians against fascism or lawless thrill-seekers

‘Very threatening’: Mother of Charlottesville suspect James A. Fields called 911 twice

‘Let’s party likes it’s 1933’: Inside the alt-right world of Richard Spencer

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

CMO Today: Facebook Announces ‘Clear History’ Tool, Dating Service; Google’s Culture of Nonstop Debate

May 2, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

As more scrutiny has been poured on Facebook’s data-collection practices in recent months, questions keep popping up about the information Facebook has on you, including the non-Facebook sites you visit and whether you have adequate control over that data collection. At F8, Facebook had an answer: It’s introducing a “clear history” tool that will give users the ability to see and control the data Facebook receives about them from outside apps and websites that use its ads and analytics tools. It’s hard to know how many users will rush to clear that data–Facebook previously said it hadn’t seen a groundswell of users changing their privacy settings following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. And even if they do, Facebook says it’ll still provide aggregated analytics to apps and websites. Noah Mallin, Wavemaker’s head of experience, content and sponsorships, tells me “clear history” doesn’t necessarily mean this data won’t be usable for targeting, but it may mean advertisers need to work with other sources to get it and load it into the platform. “Overall, that could drive costs up, though it’s too early to say that would be so across the board,” Mr. Mallin said.

Blind Date

Here’s a new Facebook product I didn’t hear anyone asking for: One of the big announcements at F8 on Tuesday was a new dating feature, which Mr. Zuckerberg said would foster “real, long-term relationships—not just hookups.” No word yet on whether the service will be free or whether it’ll be a free feature designed to boost engagement (pun unintended) and presumably show more ads. Rival dating companies (and Twitter users) scoffed at the idea of Facebook Dating. “We’re surprised at the timing given the amount of personal and sensitive data that comes with this territory,” Match Group CEO Mandy Ginsberg said. “Their product could be great for U.S.-Russia relationships,” said Joey Levin, the chief executive of IAC, Match Group’s majority owner. The joke may be on them, though, as Facebook already has 200 million users who identify as single on the platform, so attracting new users probably won’t be as much of a problem as it would be for a new dating service. Match’s share price dropped 22% and IAC lost more than 17% on Tuesday.

Give Peace a Chance

Most workplaces will play host to the odd political debate between colleagues from time to time. But at Google, the environment has become “a virtual war zone of debate over all manner of social and political beliefs” WSJ reports, in this fascinating deepdive into the culture at the search-and-advertising giant. That fractious culture, of course, was brought to public attention last summer when Google fired software engineer James Damore, who wrote an internal memo entitled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber” that suggested men are better suited for tech jobs than women, which went viral inside the company. Google’s difficulty curating the different views and voices within its own empire comes at the same time the company is trying to define, for billions of users and thousands of advertisers, the types of content that should be allowed on its search results and YouTube. As internal political arguments become more of a distraction, people familiar with the matter say Google executives are drawing up a new set of guidelines about what can and can’t be said on its internal forums.

A Design For Life

When the Snapchat redesigned rolled out in November, Chief Executive Evan Spiegel warned that while it was for the best in the long term, there was a “strong likelihood” the new look would be “disruptive to our business in the short term.” He certainly got the second part of that prediction right. Snap reported a 54% rise in revenue to $230.7 million in its first quarter, missing analyst estimates and sending shares tumbling. That’s somewhat surprising considering the Olympics took place in the quarter. Snap added 4 million daily users in the quarter, falling about 3 million short of analysts’ expectations. On the call, Snap said it was transitioning its premium Lens and Filter ad products to a programmatic buying model, which is bringing the average order value down. But Pivotal Research senior analyst Brian Wieser posited in a research note that slower revenue growth was less about the transition to programmatic and more likely due to large advertisers, collectively, allocating smaller budgets to Snapchat over time.

Best of the rest

Here’s a rundown of all the possible outcomes to the ATT-Time Warner trial. A ruling will be announced on June 12. [WSJ]

Mark Zuckerberg said in a meeting with a group of news executives that the company is “essentially going to be losing money on political ads,” owing to the investment Facebook is making to avoid a repeat of the misinformation spread during the 2016 U.S. election. [BuzzFeed News]

At the same briefing, Mr. Zuckerberg also dismissed an idea proposed by media executives including The Wall Street Journal parent company News Corp.’s Rupert Murdoch and BuzzFeed’s Jonah Peretti that Facebook should pay publishers for content in the same way cable networks pay carriage fees to program makers. “I’m not sure that makes sense,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. [Recode]

At its NewFront event Tuesday, Verizon’s Oath announced 10 new original series and a partnership with Samsung to distribute its content and native ads on Galaxy devices in the U.S. and some other global markets. [The Drum]

Condé Nast is launching over-the-top channels for its Wired, Bon Appetit and GQ brands that will be available on Apple TV, Roku and Amazon Fire. [Ad Age]

Disney’s big NewFront announcement was new food-focused editorial brand called Disney Eats, which will run on the Disney Digital Network. [Adweek]

Digital media company Studio71 announced a slate of original programming at its NewFront, including content from YouTube comedy duo Rhett Link and a renewal of “This Might Get,” the daily talk show from YouTube comedians Grace Helbig and Mamrie Hart. [Variety]

Emails show how app developers are encouraged by marketing firms to sell user data. [BuzzFeed News]

About Us

Follow us on Twitter: @wsjCMO, @larakiara, @VranicaWSJ, @alexbruell,@BenMullin, @srabil, @asharma

Subscribe to our morning newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox, at http://on.wsj.com/CMOTodaySignup.

Write to Lara O’Reilly at lara.oreilly@wsj.com

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS