Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Prosecutor launches probe of Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens following extramarital affair revelation

January 12, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

A St. Louis prosecutor on Thursday said she would investigate published allegations that Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens threatened to blackmail a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair by saying he would distribute a nude photo of her if she revealed the relationship.

“The serious allegations against” Greitens “are very troubling,” said St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner in a statement. “After further consideration, I have decided to launch a formal investigation into the alleged actions of Governor Greitens.”

“It is essential for residents of the City of St. Louis and our state to have confidence in their leaders,” she said. “They must know that the Office of the Circuit Attorney will hold public officials accountable in the same manner as any other resident of our city. Both parties and the people of St. Louis deserve a thorough investigation of these allegations.”

The alleged actions, which have been denied by Greitens’ lawyer, stem from a report by KMOV in St. Louis which featured a surreptitious recording purportedly of the woman with whom Greitens acknowledges having an affair in 2015. She describes Greitens inviting her to his home and taking pictures of her naked and then threatening to use them against her if she ever mentioned their relationship.

Greitens (R), responding to media reports, acknowledged Wednesday night that he was unfaithful to his wife “a few years ago” before being elected. But his lawyer denied the blackmail allegation.

The lawyer, James F. Bennett, responded to the prosecutor’s statement Thursday, saying the “governor is very confident he will be cleared in any investigation,” according to the St. Louis Post Dispatch. This is a three-year-old personal matter that presents no matters of public or legal interest. The facts will prove that fully.”

The woman, who has not been named publicly, was Greitens’s hair stylist, according to media reports confirmed by The Washington Post with a source familiar with the situation.

A joint statement posted Wednesday night by Greitens and his wife, Sheena, said in part that “a few years ago . . . there was a time when he was unfaithful in our marriage. This was a deeply personal mistake. Eric took responsibility, and we dealt with this together honestly and privately.”

Greitens, 43, is a relatively new star in the Republican Party who boasts an extraordinary résumé: Former Navy SEAL and Lt. Commander, attended Duke University on scholarship; Rhodes scholar at Oxford; PhD, author and White House Fellow during the administration of President George W. Bush. He is the author of “Resilience: Hard-Won Wisdom for Living a Better Life” and, according to a profile in St. Louis Magazine, has had presidential aspirations since he was a young man. His wife, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Missouri, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for East Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington.


Missouri’s first lady, Sheena Greitens, an assistant professor at the University of Missouri, sits for an interview in Columbia. (Luke Brodarick/Missourian via AP)

A Democrat-turned-Republican, Greitens was elected governor in November 2016 after a campaign that emphasized his status as a family man. Greitens and his wife have two children. “I’m Eric Greitens,” he said during the campaign. “I’m a Navy SEAL, native Missourian and most importantly, a proud husband and father.”

The governor had just delivered his state-of-the-state address Wednesday when KMOV in St. Louis broke the story about his affair with his former hairdresser in 2015.

The extramarital relationship itself, however, may have been the least explosive part of the story.

More unusual was what she purportedly said in a recording made surreptitiously by the woman’s jealous ex-husband, which the station played.

In it, she can be heard telling how Greitens invited her to his home in 2015. Once she arrived, he told her he would show her how to do pullups, taped her hands to exercise rings and blindfolded her, all with her consent.

Then, to her shock, she alleged, he snapped photographs of her naked and threatened to distribute the pictures if she revealed the relationship.

On what was supposed to be a banner evening for Greitens, he then was forced to issue the statement with his wife confirming the affair. His wife also issued her own statement:

We have a loving marriage and an awesome family; anything beyond that is between us and God. I want the media and those who wish to peddle gossip to stay away from me and my children.

Neither the governor or his wife said anything about the reported photo shoot or the alleged blackmail threat.

That came in a separate statement by the couple’s attorney, Bennett, who denied the blackmail claim. “There was no ‘blackmail,’ ” lawyer Bennett said in a written statement, “and that claim is false . . . The outrageous claims of improper contact regarding these almost three-year-ago events are a lie.”

The whole story, which had been the stuff of wild rumors for weeks, originated with the spurned ex-husband, who told KMOV that the relationship between Greitens and the man’s then-wife had led to the breakup of their marriage.

Afterward, the ex-husband went on social media calling Greitens a “homewrecker,” according to KMOV. He then tried to go public with his story and with the recording, speaking with both of Missouri’s major newspapers.

The St. Louis Post Dispatch and the Kansas City Star reported that they too had possession of a transcript of the surreptitious recording and had interviewed the ex-husband. Both papers said they had decided against writing a story because the woman declined to be interviewed. Once the governor released a public statement the papers pushed ahead with their stories.

KMOV decided otherwise. Although it said it had no “on-the-record-comment” from the woman, it went with the story Wednesday night under the headline “Blackmail alleged as Governor Greitens admits to extramarital affair” and took credit for prompting Greitens’s statement.

“I am not after anything,” the ex-husband, who was also unnamed, told KMOV. “I am not a part of politics. I am not a part of anything. I just want to move on with my life.”

He claimed to have been contacted by law enforcement authorities as well as members of the media.

Bennett, Greitens’s lawyer, said in his statement that there was nothing about the relationship that “has generated or should generate law enforcement interest.”

Greitens has received mixed reviews in as governor. While campaigning on a platform of cleaning up government, he admitted to the Missouri Ethics Commission that he had violated campaign finance law, according to the Kansas City Star. He was fined $1,000. He and his senior staff have also come under fire for using an app that deletes text messages after they’ve been read, raising concerns about trying to subvert Missouri open records law.

Comments posted on Greitens’s Facebook page reflected a mixed reaction to the Wednesday’s revelations.

“This was March of 2015,” wrote one woman, “most likely when your wife was pregnant or had a new baby. There are transcripts. What is so fraudulent is that Eric Greitens ran as a ‘family man.’ ”

“There are many in Missouri who stand behind you as governor,” wrote another, “and support your family . . . Lead on and God Bless!”

Here is the full statement, as posted on Facebook, by Greitens and his wife and the couple’s lawyer:

I wanted to share with you some statements that are important in light of news you may have seen tonight.

A statement from James F. Bennett, our attorney:

“The Governor has now seen the TV report that ran tonight. The station declined to provide the tape or transcript in advance of running their story, which contained multiple false allegations. The claim that this nearly three-year old story has generated or should generate law enforcement interest is completely false. There was no ‘blackmail,’ and that claim is false. This personal matter has been addressed by the Governor and Mrs. Greitens privately years ago when it happened. The outrageous claims of improper conduct regarding these almost three-year-ago events are a lie.”

Joint statement from Sheena and I:

“A few years ago, before Eric was elected governor, there was a time when he was unfaithful in our marriage. This was a deeply personal mistake. Eric took responsibility, and we dealt with this together honestly and privately. While we never would have wished for this pain in our marriage, or the pain that this has caused others, with God’s mercy Sheena has forgiven and we have emerged stronger. We understand that there will be some people who cannot forgive — but for those who can find it in your heart, Eric asks for your forgiveness, and we are grateful for your love, your compassion, and your prayers.”

This story has been updated.

More from Morning Mix:

Creator of the ‘Media Men List’ of accused sexual harassers outs herself

In 1955 she was kicked out of the Air Force for being a lesbian. Now, at 90, she is fighting back.

An Army vet was purged from Ohio’s voter rolls. Now a mayor, he confronted the official in charge.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Trump Administration Says States May Impose Work Requirements for Medicaid

January 12, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

In a speech to state Medicaid officials in November, Ms. Verma indicated that the Trump administration would be receptive to work requirements and other conservative policy ideas to reshape Medicaid. And she criticized the Obama administration, saying it had focused on increasing Medicaid enrollment rather than helping people move out of poverty and into jobs.

“Believing that community engagement requirements do not support or promote the objectives of Medicaid is a tragic example of the soft bigotry of low expectations consistently espoused by the prior administration,” Ms. Verma said. “Those days are over.”

The Medicaid proposals came from Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. Several other states are considering work requirements.

In one state, Kentucky, the waiver application seeks to require most non-disabled Medicaid beneficiaries age 19 to 64 to work at least 20 hours a week. They could meet the requirement through not just paid employment, but also volunteer work, job training, searching for a job, going to school or taking care of someone elderly or disabled.

Pregnant women, full-time students and primary caretakers of children under 19 or disabled adult dependents would be exempt from the state’s work requirement, as would people deemed medically frail.

Advocates for Medicaid beneficiaries said the new policy was likely to be challenged in court if people were denied coverage for failure to meet a state’s work requirement.

Federal law gives the secretary of health and human services broad authority to grant waivers for state demonstration projects that “promote the objectives’’ of the Medicaid program. In the past, federal officials said that work was not among those objectives.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

But Trump administration officials said on Thursday that work requirements were consistent with the goals of Medicaid, because work and work-related activities could improve the health of Medicaid beneficiaries.

“Productive work and community engagement may improve health outcomes,” Brian Neale, the director of the federal Medicaid office, said on Thursday in a letter to state Medicaid directors. “For example, higher earnings are positively correlated with longer life span.”

In addition, Mr. Neale said, researchers have found “strong evidence that unemployment is generally harmful to health,” while employment tends to improve “general mental health.”

Medicaid beneficiaries could work at a variety of jobs — as cashiers, telemarketers, housekeepers, nursing and home health aides, child care providers, cooks and dishwashers, waiters and waitresses, retail sales clerks, landscapers, security guards and construction laborers, for example. They could also work as volunteers at food pantries and other charitable organizations.

The Trump administration said that states imposing work requirements must have plans to help people meet those requirements and should help arrange job training, child care and transportation as needed. But, it said, states cannot use federal Medicaid funds to pay for such “supportive services.”

Interactive Graphic

A Year Later, Trump Is Less Popular Across Voting Blocs. See by How Much.

President Trump’s approval rating fell across many demographic groups over his first year in office, including among those seen as important to his base.


Medicaid has a major role in combating the opioid epidemic, paying for a wide range of treatments and medications. But people addicted to opioids are often unable to work or to find jobs, and some employers are reluctant to hire people who fail drug tests.

Ms. Verma said the Trump administration would require states to make “reasonable modifications” of their work requirements for people who are addicted to opioids or have other substance use disorders.

For example, she said, time spent in medical treatment for opioid addiction might be counted toward compliance with a state’s work requirement. Alternatively, she said, states could exempt people from the work requirement if they were participating in “intensive medical treatment” for addiction.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

The Trump administration said that state Medicaid officials could not impose work requirements on pregnant women, elderly beneficiaries, children or people who were unable to work because of a disability. States must also create exemptions for people who are “medically frail.”

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Despite such exemptions, Democrats called the new policy inhumane, meanspirited and malicious, echoing criticism of work requirements in a welfare law adopted in 1996.

Representative Frank Pallone Jr. of New Jersey, the senior Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said that “the Trump administration’s action today is cruel and a clear violation of both the Medicaid statute and longstanding congressional intent” for waivers, which he said were meant to “allow states to expand access to Medicaid, not restrict it.”

Brad Woodhouse, the campaign director of Protect Our Care, an advocacy group that supports the Affordable Care Act, said the new policy was “the latest salvo of the Trump administration’s war on health care.”

“A majority of adults covered by Medicaid who can work, do work — often two or three jobs in fields like the service industry that are less likely to offer insurance,” Mr. Woodhouse said.

Advocates for Medicaid beneficiaries said that work requirements would harm some people who are unemployed, making it more difficult for them to obtain the health care they need.

“There are strong reasons to believe that work requirements will reduce access to health care and thereby make it harder for some people to work,” said Hannah Katch, a policy analyst at the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

But the new policy is exactly what some Republican governors were seeking.

In his State of the State address on Tuesday, Gov. Phil Bryant of Mississippi, a Republican, said he supported a “work force requirement” for able-bodied adults on Medicaid.

“This is not, as some would have you believe, a punitive action aimed at recipients,” Mr. Bryant said. “It will actually help this population reap the rewards of a good job, and one day receive health care coverage from their employer, not the state or federal government.”

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Gov. Dennis Daugaard of South Dakota, a Republican, said he would seek a waiver for a work requirement that could affect 4,500 people.

“Work is an important part of personal fulfillment,” Mr. Daugaard said. “There’s a sense of pride that comes with having a job to do and being able to provide for your family.”

Mr. Neale, the federal Medicaid official, acknowledged that the support for work requirements was “a shift from prior agency policy,” but he said that such requirements could “promote the objectives of Medicaid.”

People who meet the work requirements of the food stamp program and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families “must automatically be considered to be complying with the Medicaid work requirements,” Mr. Neale said. .

The federal government and states generally share the cost of Medicaid and could save money if enrollment goes down because of work requirements. White House officials say Medicaid spending is growing at an unsustainable rate, and last year President Trump supported bills that would have cut hundreds of billions of dollars from projected Medicaid spending over 10 years.

More than 70 million Americans are enrolled in Medicaid, and the federal government spent more than $350 billion on the program in the last fiscal year, the Congressional Budget Office says.

Abby Goodnough contributed reporting.


Continue reading the main story

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS