Monday, October 28, 2024

Australian Government’s Secret ‘Cabinet Files’ Were Found In … An Old Cabinet

February 1, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s government is looking into how hundreds of secret documents were left inside two large cabinets that were sold. He’s seen here with members of his cabinet after they were sworn in in 2016.

Rob Griffith/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Rob Griffith/AP

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s government is looking into how hundreds of secret documents were left inside two large cabinets that were sold. He’s seen here with members of his cabinet after they were sworn in in 2016.

Rob Griffith/AP

Australia’s government is holding “an urgent investigation” into how hundreds of classified documents about the interior workings of several recent administrations found their way to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

The ABC says the thousands of pages of documents had been left in two filing cabinets — which the government then sold off at a second-hand shop. The records were bought cheap, the network says, because they were locked and the keys had been lost.

Inside the cabinets were records of five separate governments that spanned nearly 10 years; some of them refer to current members of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s Cabinet.

The ABC began publishing parts of the files this week, revealing the embarrassing inner workings of government — and, today, reporting that the trove of documents also include references to at least two other previously unknown breaches, in which hundreds more secret and sensitive documents were either lost or left unsupervised.

Dubbing the documents the Cabinet Files, the network calls it “one of the biggest breaches of cabinet security in Australian history” — adding that “the story of their release is as gripping as it is alarming and revealing.”

Among the files’ revelations:

  • Former immigration minister Scott Morrison, who’s currently Turnbull’s treasurer, acted in late 2013 to limit the number of approved asylum seekers, by arranging to “delay security checks so that people close to being granted permanent protection would miss the deadline” — a move that reportedly affected 30 asylum seekers each week.
  • Looking to cut spending under Prime Minister Tony Abbott, his top treasury and finance officials considered denying welfare to anyone who’s under 30. A range of scenarios were considered that targeted “job snobs,” the ABC says — but the plan was shelved over a potential backlash.
  • After controversial commentator Andrew Bolt was successfully accused of breaking the Racial Discrimination Act in 2011, the cabinet later asked Bolt about changing the law’s “unreasonably restrictive” reach — and “was the only person specifically named as having been consulted,” the ABC says, citing draft legislation that is part of the files.
  • “Nearly 200 top-secret code word protected and sensitive documents were left in the office of senior minister Penny Wong when Labor lost the 2013 election,” the ABC says. The materials dealt with topics ranging from details of counter-terrorism operations to how to defend the United Arab Emirates from Iran. Those documents were eventually found by security staff, who saw them destroyed.
  • Nearly 400 national security files went missing from the Australian Federal Police over the course of five years, from 2008-2013. The ABC says those classified records were from “the powerful National Security Committee (NSC) of the cabinet, which controls the country’s security, intelligence and defense agenda.”
  • “The cabinet secretariat’s general practice was to give up searching and write off lost documents if they could not be found” after repeated attempts.

When ABC began publishing some of the news from the documents this week, it triggered speculation about a possible leak in the current government that Turnbull has led since 2015. But the network says there was no leak, and that no one broke the law — instead, someone finally got around to drilling out the locks on the two heavy cabinets that had been sold without any matching keys.

“The documents were in two locked filing cabinets sold at an ex-government sale in Canberra,” the ABC says. “A nifty person drilled the locks and uncovered the trove of documents inside.”

The cabinets and their contents were bought “for small change” in a sale that could have been made to anyone, the network says. It adds, “The thousands of pages reveal the inner workings of five separate governments and span nearly a decade. Nearly all the files are classified, some as ‘top secret’ or ‘AUSTEO,’ which means they are to be seen by Australian eyes only.”

The ABC isn’t releasing any names or details about who bought the old, information-rich cabinets, or how it learned about them. Citing confidential sources, the network says it will “protect their privacy at all costs.”

After news of the massive security breach broke, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet provided no more details, releasing a statement saying only that it’s looking into “the circumstances around the disposal of two Commonwealth Government filing cabinets that allegedly contained classified material.”

Under Australian law, the Cabinet records would have become public only after at least 20 years had passed. But thanks to those other, more common cabinets, they’re being scrutinized now.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Trump promises ’100 percent’ to release memo, as White House insists it will follow national security process

February 1, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

The White House is broadcasting mixed messages as aides attempt to qualify President Trump’s Tuesday night statement that he would “100 percent” authorize the public release of a GOP memo of alleged surveillance abuses at the FBI and Department of Justice.

“There are no current plans to release the House Intelligence Committee’s memo,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on CNN Wednesday morning, noting that Trump had not “seen or been briefed” on the memo’s contents before he made those comments Tuesday night.

But later Wednesday morning, White House chief of staff Gen. John Kelly told Fox News radio that the memo will “be released here pretty quick,” just as soon as the White House’s national security lawyers finish “slicing and dicing and looking at it so that we know what it means.”

On Tuesday night, Trump promised to publicize the memo in comments to Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), who asked the president to “release the memo” as Trump was exiting the House chamber following his first State of the Union address.

“Oh yeah, oh, don’t worry,” Trump told him. “100 percent.”

President Trump delivers his first State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress inside the House Chamber on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. (Reuters)

The exchange was caught by television cameras filming his departure. A White House spokesman confirmed soon after that the president intended to release the memo.

The comments appeared to jump ahead of plans to assure critics that the White House is putting the memo through a formal vetting process before the president makes a decision. They are also the latest sign that Trump is out of step with parts of his administration when it comes to whether, or how, the memo ought to be made public.

Sanders also insisted that the White house planned to “complete the legal and national security review that has to take place” before deciding whether the memo should be released.

“There’s always a chance” the memo won’t be released, Sanders said. “No one here is going to make a decision that jeopardizes national security.”

But since the memo issue emerged, Trump has been at odds with top federal law enforcement officials about whether it should be made public.

On Monday, the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to make the four-page document available to the public, something that will happen if Trump does not act to block its release within five days. Just before the vote, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, who viewed the memo over the weekend, and deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein, made a last-ditch plea to White House chief of staff Gen. John Kelly not to approve the House panel’s action, explaining that it could compromise intelligence gathering and set a dangerous precedent.

It was not the first time that Justice Department officials had warned that releasing the memo could compromise intelligence gathering sources and methods, and threaten national security. But at the White House, Trump made his desire to release the memo clear despite those warnings, prompting Kelly to apprise Attorney General Jeff Sessions of the president’s plans.

Conservative Republican members of Congress were sure days before that Trump would be on board with their campaign to publicize it. The push began shortly after the House Intelligence panel voted on the morning of Jan. 18 to make the memo available to members to read in a secure facility; that afternoon, leaders of the conservative House Freedom Caucus took a phone call from Trump in which they told him of the memo and their plans. Caucus members told of the conversation immediately afterward came away with the impression “that he would want it released . . . since it helps the president so much,” as Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) put it.

The memo was written by staffers for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) earlier this month, after the panel procured from the FBI and Justice Department long sought-after documents related to a now-famous dossier of allegations concerning Trump and his purported ties to Kremlin officials. Sanders told CNN Wednesday that Trump was “not aware of any conversation or coordination” between Nunes and the White House on the production or release of the memo, but didn’t rule out the possibility entirely, saying: “I just don’t know the answer.”

The memo alleges that the British ex-spy who wrote the memo, Christopher Steele, passed bad information to the FBI — though people familiar with the document said it does not determine whether he did so intentionally or by mistake. The memo alleges that information formed the basis for an application to conduct surveillance against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Republicans have long been suspicious of the dossier, particularly since learning that Steele’s work was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Democrats, however, allege that the GOP memo is nothing but a hit job designed to weaken the federal law enforcement agencies behind special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including Trump’s alleged ties to Russian officials. They have prepared a memo countering the allegations in the GOP memo written by Nunes’s staff, but the Democrats’ document is only available to members to read in a secure facility.

John Wagner contributed to this report.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS