Friday, October 25, 2024

Science teacher allegedly fed puppy to turtle in front of students

March 14, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

A science teacher at a junior high school in Idaho was accused of feeding a puppy to a snapping turtle in front of students after school, according to reports.

It was not immediately clear if the little pooch was dead or alive when Robert Crosland, a longtime teacher at Preston Junior High School, allegedly fed it to the turtle after class on Wednesday, according to East Idaho News.

“The event occurred well after students had been dismissed and was not part of any school-directed program,” Preston School District Superintendent Marc Gee said in a statement. “We emphasize that at no time was the safety of students or staff compromised.”

As of early Tuesday, Crosland still appeared in the school’s online directory. He was not cited, criminally charged or placed on leave as of late Monday, Gee told East Idaho News.

“A part of any investigation includes determining the best course of action once the facts of the matter have been ascertained,” Gee said. “This is not a situation that is easy, nor do we feel it is a measure that can be taken lightly.”

Franklin County Sheriff Dave Fryar told the Idaho Statesman that he forwarded a report of the incident to the county prosecutor.

“The prosecutor said, ‘Until he decides, he considers it an open book,’” Fryar said. “He doesn’t want us to do anything to hamper the investigation.”

Several current and former students said Crosland is a well-liked teacher at the school who kept exotic animals like snakes and other reptiles in tanks in his classroom. Three former students who asked not to be identified said they remember Crosland feeding guinea pigs to snakes and snapping turtles during in-class demonstrations.

“He is a cool teacher who really brought science to life,” one former student told East Idaho News. “I loved his class because he had turtles and snakes and other cool things.”

The district now wants to make sure “this type of action could not be repeated,” but Gee asked parents and other critics to remember the “care, effort and passion” Crosland has demonstrated in the classroom for years. In a statement, Gee characterized the alleged feeding as a “regrettable circumstance” involving animals at the school.

But an animal activist who filed a police report in connection with the alleged feeding was not sympathetic, calling Crosland’s actions “disgusting” and offensive.

“It is sick,” Jill Parrish told KSTU. “It is sick.”

Parrish said a teacher told her last week that Crosland fed the puppy, which was believed to be disfigured, to one of his reptiles in class: a snake and a snapping turtle.

“Allowing children to watch an innocent baby puppy scream because it is being fed to an animal … that is violence,” Parrish said. “That is not okay.”

In a statement, animal rights group PETA called the teacher a “bully who should not be allowed near impressionable young people.”

“Any youngster who witnessed cruelty in the classroom is now in desperate need of lessons about having empathy for other living beings,” said PETA Senior Director of Cruelty Casework Stephanie Bell.

Este Hull, a seventh-grader at the school, said she has only known Crosland to feed his animals mice or birds.

“I feel a little better that it was a puppy that was going to die, not just a healthy puppy,” Hull said.

Another parent of a student at the school echoed Hull’s sentiment.

“If it was a deformed puppy that was going to die anyway, [Crosland] is very much circle of life,” parent Annette Salvesen told the station.

That explanation didn’t satisfy Parrish, however.

“There’s a lot of humane things you can do,” Parrish told KSTU. “Feeding a live animal to a reptile is not humane and it’s not okay.”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

US Steel may be ‘worse off’ after tariffs, but it is a ‘great short’, says Wall Street analyst

March 14, 2018 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

<!– –>







United States Steel stocks may be in worse shape after President Donald Trump’s tariffs take effect, even though these are meant to help the steel industry — but it will be a “great short,” according to a Wall Street analyst.

Vertical Research Group analyst Gordon Johnson told CNBC’s “Closing Bell” on Tuesday that “there was too much good news priced in” U.S. Steel’s former valuation.

Johnson called U.S. Steel “significantly, fundamentally, worse off” with the tariffs, set to begin later this month. He doesn’t think the tariffs will do the company or investors much good in the long run.

He added: “It’s going to hurt the global economy and steel prices.”

Johnson also pointed out that operating costs for the company, including costs associated with its soon-to-be-reopened Granite City Works integrated plant in Illinois — what he called “one of the least efficient steel mills in the world” — are up. This means they will not benefit from the higher steel prices, he said.

Last week, Trump signed off on tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, exempting Canada and Mexico.

On Tuesday, the group downgraded U.S. Steel stocks from hold to sell. Stock prices quickly fell about 8 percent, from about $44 to around $40.

“The steel mills are not going to be able to go to the government and argue for protectionism. They’re going to have to compete in a global market now. That’s going to be bad for prices,” Johnson added.

But the analyst, who specializes in alternative energy, metals and mining and equipment rental research, told CNBC this might be good news for investors.

“It’s a great short,” said the Wall Street analyst, referring to the process of selling borrowed shares in the hopes of buying back the same stock at a lower price and turning a profit.

He pointed out that former President George W. Bush placed tariffs on imported steel back in 2002 for just eight months. But he gave more than 700 exemptions on steel products and countries because the U.S. didn’t — and still doesn’t — produce enough steel to meet its needs.

“If you actually shorted U.S. Steel stocks on that decision, you would have made a lot of money,” Johnson said. “The steel stocks got hit pretty hard.”

“If President Trump actually has to implement these exclusions from products and countries, you’re going to see their earnings go down through the year,” he added.

Former President Barack Obama also granted steel mills tariffs while in office, but implemented them slowly.

Meanwhile, the guidance for U.S. Steel’s 2018 Ebitda is $1.7 billion. But Johnson said those numbers should be higher — $2.5 billion to $3 billion — with accelerated steel production and its plant reopening later this year.

U.S. Steel did not respond to a request for comment.

Playing

Share this video…

Watch Next…