Saturday, November 16, 2024

A timeline of the explosive lawsuit alleging a White House link in the Seth Rich conspiracy

August 2, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

NPR’s David Folkenflik reported Tuesday morning on a lawsuit filed by a man named Rod Wheeler that makes a remarkable claim: The Trump White House — or President Trump personally — may have been aware of or involved in a discredited Fox News story about the killing of a Democratic National Committee staffer last July.

It’s a complicated story that, we hasten to add, is based on allegations in a lawsuit filed by a person whose quotes in that discredited story were themselves discredited. But the lawsuit includes documentary evidence (like text messages), and Folkenflik was given access to recorded calls that bolster the story as presented. What’s more, the lawsuit is predicated on Wheeler’s assertion that he never said the quotes attributed to him.

Given the complexity of the story, we’ve taken the details in the lawsuit and arranged them as a timeline. First, though, it’s important to understand the cast of characters.

Rod Wheeler. Wheeler is a former D.C. homicide detective who now does private investigation work. Wheeler has been contributing to Fox News for more than a decade, even through this weekend. It’s Wheeler who’s filed the lawsuit, as will be explained below.

Ed Butowsky. A wealthy businessman who strongly supported the candidacy of Donald Trump and makes frequent appearances on the Fox Business network. BuzzFeed profiled him earlier this year.

Malia Zimmerman. A reporter for Fox News.

Seth Rich. A former Democratic National Committee staffer who was killed last year. This is where the timeline begins.


July 10, 2016
Rich is shot to death in Washington during what D.C. police describe as an attempted armed robbery. The case remains unsolved.

July 22, 2016
WikiLeaks releases a batch of emails stolen from the DNC. That Rich was killed shortly before these files were released eventually spawns conspiracy theories about the possibility that Rich may have been involved in a plot to release them that ended in his murder.

U.S. intelligence agencies dismiss that idea. Their evidence suggests that the DNC network was accessed over a long period of time by two different Russian government agencies, as early as the summer of 2015.

Jan. 20, 2017
Trump is inaugurated as president.

February
Butowsky reaches out to Rich’s family to offer to help fund an investigation into their son’s death. They agree.

At some point before or during February, Butowsky apparently speaks with veteran journalist Seymour Hersh, who Butowsky says indicated a link between Rich and the FBI. Hersh told Folkenflik it was “gossip” and that Butowsky “took two and two and made forty-five out of it.”

Feb. 23
Butowsky allegedly texts Wheeler to pitch him on pursuing the Rich investigation. That text:

The two speak on the phone.

Feb. 28
Butowsky, Zimmerman and Wheeler meet for the first time. Wheeler indicates that he’s surprised Zimmerman is at the meeting.

Butowsky later introduces Wheeler to the Rich family but allegedly asks that he not mention the link to Fox News.

March 14
The Rich family retains Wheeler to investigate the killing, paid for by Butowsky.

April 18
According to the lawsuit, Butowsky allegedly texts Wheeler to ask him to join a meeting with White House press secretary Sean Spicer.

The lawsuit alleges that Butowsky explained the reason for the meeting as to “keep [Spicer] abreast” of the investigation.

April 20

Butowsky and Wheeler meet with Spicer. Wheeler’s lawsuit claims that Spicer was given a copy of the outline of Wheeler’s investigation and asked to be kept updated about it.

Spicer later acknowledged the meeting to NPR’s Folkenflik.

“It had nothing to do with advancing the president’s domestic agenda — and there was no agenda,” Spicer told Folkenflik. “They were just informing me of the [Fox] story.”

April 25
Wheeler meets with a D.C. detective investigating Rich’s murder, who indicates that he has no evidence that the killing was anything other than a robbery. Butowsky allegedly sends an email to Wheeler saying that if the detective doesn’t help, “we will go after him as being part of the coverup.”

May 9
Trump fires FBI Director James B. Comey.

May 10
Butowsky and Zimmerman allegedly call Wheeler and inform him that they’ve identified an FBI source who can confirm emails between Rich and WikiLeaks.

May 11
Zimmerman shares a draft of her story with Wheeler. It doesn’t include quotes from Wheeler about that FBI link.

May 14
Wheeler claims that Butowsky had repeatedly made remarks about how the White House was paying attention to the story. On May 14, Butowsky calls Wheeler and leaves a message that Wheeler shared with Folkenflik.

“A couple of minutes ago,” Butowsky says, “I got a note that we have the full attention of the White House on this and tomorrow let’s close this deal.”

He then texts Wheeler to inform him that Trump read Zimmerman’s article and wants it published.

To NPR, both Spicer and Butowsky deny that the president reviewed the story. Butowsky told Folkenflik he was “joking with a friend.”

May 15
The Washington Post, continuing a second week of scoops about the Trump administration,
reports that Trump revealed classified information in a private May 10 meeting with the Russian foreign minister.

Zimmerman informs Wheeler that her story is going to be posted shortly. She asks Wheeler for quotes on specific topics, neither of which relates to the alleged source at the FBI.

With the story set to publish, Butowsky allegedly emails Wheeler and the hosts and producers of Fox News’ “Fox and Friends.” He reinforces a key point of what he hopes to accomplish: Undercut the idea that Trump’s election was aided by Russian interference. (Emphasis is from the lawsuit.)

Zimmerman’s story is posted on a local news station in D.C.

May 16

The story goes up on Fox News’ website. It includes quotes from Wheeler about the FBI source that he claims in the lawsuit he never gave to Zimmerman.

In a recording of a three-way call that day with Butowsky and Zimmerman provided to Folkenflik, she seems to acknowledge that.

“Not the part about, I mean, the connection to WikiLeaks, but the rest of the quotes in the story did” come from Wheeler, she says. Butowsky tells Wheeler, “One day you’re going to win an award for having said those things you didn’t say.”

Zimmerman says that her superiors at Fox News told her to keep the quotes. Wheeler had first called Butowsky to complain. Butowsky allegedly pointed the finger at the White House.

These quotes that Wheeler says were fabricated by Zimmerman are the heart of his lawsuit.

Spicer is asked about the story during the White House press briefing. He claims not to be aware of the story.

Q:    Sean, can we get a White House reaction or the President’s reaction to the report that said Rich was emailing WikiLeaks before his murder?

MR. SPICER:  I don’t — I’m not aware of — generally, I don’t get updates on DNC — former DNC staffers.  I’m not aware of that.

That night, Wheeler appears on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program and supports the story, though he claims not to have personal knowledge of a Rich-WikiLeaks link.

May 17
The local D.C. station reports that Wheeler was backtracking on the statements attributed to him — including statements made on-air.

FOX 5 DC: “You have sources at the FBI saying that there is information…”

WHEELER: “For sure…”

FOX 5 DC: “…that could link Seth Rich to WikiLeaks?”

WHEELER: “Absolutely. Yeah. That’s confirmed.”

May 23
Fox News retracts its story.

Update: At Tuesday’s daily press briefing, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders addressed the allegation. “The president had no knowledge of the story,” Sanders said, “and it’s completely untrue that he or the White House [were involved] in the story.”

Fox News also released a statement later Tuesday, denying allegations in the lawsuit: “The accusation that FoxNews.com published Malia Zimmerman’s story to help detract from coverage of the Russia collusion issue is completely erroneous. The retraction of this story is still being investigated internally and we have no evidence that Rod Wheeler was misquoted by Zimmerman.”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Los Angeles redefines ‘compromise’ in latest Olympic bidding duel

August 1, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

1:02 AM ET

CARSON, Calif. — The Olympic Games have always been a mega sporting event flush with hyperbole. Each of those 17 days are filled with physical tests to see who is the fastest, strongest and mentally toughest. So when Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti stepped onto the podium at the StubHub Center here Monday evening and formally announced the city had reached an agreement with the International Olympic Committee to host the 2028 Summer Games, his words were, well, over the top.

“There is no other metaphor. It was a marathon,” he said. “A couple times, we were counted out altogether. But we never hit a wall. We never lost our focus, and today we are at the finish line.”

Against a cloudless, powder-blue, twilight sky and with the new LA2028 slogan, “Follow the Sun,” boldly plastered on the stadium scoreboard behind him, Garcetti and the rest of the LA2024 leadership proudly celebrated the moment they had spent two years waiting for.

“We are here today to make history,” Garcetti said. “I’m proud to say the Olympics are coming back to the United States of America.”

“What we were able to negotiate — this deal was too good to pass up,” Garcetti said. “This legacy can inspire a whole new generation.”

Garcetti made no secret of his desire to make youth sport free for children in Los Angeles. He said Monday that process could begin as early as next year thanks to the $160 million, interest-free, upfront loan from the IOC. “That’s something worth fighting for,” Garcetti said.

What does the IOC expect from L.A. in return? To save the future of the Olympic movement. And no, that’s not more Olympic hyperbole.

The days of cities lining up one after another begging to host the Games are long gone. Back in September 2015, when Garcetti stood behind a podium on Santa Monica Beach to formally announce L.A. would represent the U.S. as its 2024 candidate city, the field was crowded with four other contenders: Budapest, Hamburg, Paris and Rome. But residents in three of those four cities looked at a recent string of cost overruns and pressured public officials to bag the Olympic dream. The same happened in the bidding for the 2022 Winter Games, with six cities ending their bids before a decision was made.

And who could blame those cities for dropping out. For the 2008 Summer Games, Beijing reportedly budgeted $1.6 billion and spent $40 billion. In London in 2012, $4 billion became $13 billion. Peak absurdity was reached in Sochi, where the Russians reportedly spent $51 billion to put on the 2014 Winter Games, more than every other Winter Olympics combined.

Now it becomes L.A.’s job to do the exact same thing it did in 1984 — fix the broken Olympic model. Back then, in the wake of the 1972 terrorist attack in Munich and cost overruns in Montreal four years later, L.A. was the only city to bid for the 1984 Games. The end result was a $235 million surplus, more than half of the entire $413 million budget. The money was in part used to start the LA84 Foundation, which helped fund youth sports, including a tennis league in which a young Venus and Serena Williams participated. It is also part of an endowment the USOC uses each year to help support its athletes.

“This is the same sort of watershed moment,” says Victor Matheson, an economics professor at the College of Holy Cross in Massachusetts who specializes in the impact of mega sporting events. “And it certainly looks like Los Angeles is going to bail them out again.”

Want to know how much it costs to host the Olympics? L.A.’s $5.3 billion budget doesn’t include a single new permanent venue, Olympic village or media compound. Instead, there are temporary venues and the cost to ensure the current facilities to be Olympic-ready. Though they won’t say so publicly, L.A. bid committee officials are optimistic their proposal will result in a similar economic impact on its residents. Just like Peter Ueberroth did when he negotiated that groundbreaking agreement with the IOC in 1984.

“[LA2024 chairman] Casey [Wasserman] and the mayor, they know their success will not be measured against Tokyo [in 2020] or Rio, but rather that of Peter Ueberroth,” said UCLA professor Zev Yaroslavsky, who spent 40 years as an elected official in Southern California, including 19 on the L.A. City Council. “They know that, and they want to do an even better job than Ueberroth.”

Technically, the deal isn’t 100 percent complete. The L.A. City Council will need ratify the agreement over the course of the next week; but you can believe Garcetti and other bid leaders wouldn’t have put on Monday’s show if they weren’t close to 100 percent certain the council was on their side. Later, the IOC will do the same and is expected to make the formal announcement for both Paris and Los Angeles at its meeting on Sept. 13 in Lima, Peru.

Never before has there been 11 years between when the IOC chose a host city and when the opening ceremonies occurred in that city. With the decision comes greater risk and greater opportunity; but what happens after the 2028 Games will be what matters most to the Olympic movement.

Will countries again line up looking to repeat Los Angeles’ success? How many of those cities will have the infrastructure to replicate L.A.’s template? Or will a new blueprint somehow be established, one in which the IOC will change what matters most and value bids that leave a truly prosperous legacy behind?

Monday was the first step in a long process to find out the answers.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS