Friday, November 8, 2024

Manafort Notes From Russian Meet Contain Cryptic Reference to ‘Donations’

September 1, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

WASHINGTON — Paul Manafort’s notes from a controversial Trump Tower meeting with Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign included the word “donations,” near a reference to the Republican National Committee, two sources briefed on the evidence told NBC News.

The references, which have not been previously disclosed, elevated the significance of the June 2016 meeting for congressional investigators, who are focused on determining whether it included any discussion of donations from Russian sources to either the Trump campaign or the Republican Party.

It is illegal for foreigners to donate to American elections. The meeting happened just as Trump had secured the Republican nomination for president, and he was considered a longshot to win. Manafort was the campaign chairman at the time.

Image: Trump, Manafort


Image: Trump, Manafort

Manafort’s notes, typed on a smart phone and described by one source briefed on the matter as cryptic, were turned over to the House and Senate intelligence committees and to Special Counsel Robert Mueller. They contained the words “donations,” and “RNC” in close proximity, the sources said.

Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni told NBC News that “it is 100 percent false to suggest this meeting included any discussion of donations from Russian sources to either the Trump campaign or the Republican Party. Mr. Manafort provided the Senate Intelligence Committee with the facts and his notes so this speculation and conjecture is pointless and wrong.”

As NBC News has reported, Mueller is closely scrutinizing the Trump Tower meeting, which was hosted by President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and was attended by his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, along with Manafort.

Related: Mueller, NY Attorney General Joining Forces on Manafort Probe

They gathered in an office to hear from Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who has represented clients with links to the Kremlin.

She was accompanied by Russian-American lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin, who testified recently before a grand jury in Washington, a source with direct knowledge of the matter told NBC News.

Akhmetshin declined to comment on his testimony.

NBC News reported earlier this week that Mueller’s investigators are keenly focused on President Donald Trump’s role in crafting a response to the New York Times article that first disclosed the meeting.



The sources told NBC News that prosecutors want to know what Trump knew about the meeting and whether he sought to conceal its purpose.

The president dictated a statement sent out under the name of his son that was drafted aboard Air Force One, people familiar with the matter have said.

It described the 2016 meeting as “a short introductory meeting.”

“I asked Jared and Paul to stop by,” the statement said. “We primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children that was active and popular with American families years ago and was since ended by the Russian government, but it was not a campaign issue at the time and there was no follow up.”

According to the New York Times, he added: “I was asked to attend the meeting by an acquaintance, but was not told the name of the person I would be meeting with beforehand.”

In fact, as subsequent emails and interviews revealed, the meeting was scheduled with a promise from a Russian oligarch to convey damaging information about Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

In a June 3, 2016, email, publicist Rob Goldstone told Trump Jr. that a Russian prosecutor had “offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary [Clinton] … and would be very useful to your father.”

Goldstone said he was representing Aras Agalarov, a Russian businessman with close ties to Vladimir Putin.

Trump Jr. responded, “[I]f it’s what you say, I love it.”

Emails show that the following day, Goldstone and Trump Jr. began arranging the Trump Tower meeting.

Veselnitskaya told NBC News that she did not provide any meaningful information about Clinton.

A person familiar with Mueller’s strategy said that whether or not Trump made a “knowingly false statement” is now of interest to prosecutors.

“Even if Trump is not charged with a crime as a result of the statement, it could be useful to Mueller’s team to show Trump’s conduct to a jury that may be considering other charges,” the person said.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Two new tropical threats are taking shape in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean

September 1, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

As Harvey moves away from the Gulf Coast, a new storm is brewing in the Atlantic and forecasters are monitoring the potential for yet another storm in the Gulf of Mexico.

Hurricane Irma is expected to become a formidable cyclone, and its path puts the Caribbean and the Southeast U.S. coast at risk. It’s too soon to predict exactly where it will track once it reaches the Caribbean. But this time of year, history has taught us that these kinds of storms — beasts that form just off the coast of Africa, near the equator — are not to be ignored.

Irma is forecast to intensify significantly: There’s essentially zero vertical wind shear, very warm water temperatures, humid air and a robust preexisting circulation. In layman’s terms, conditions are ripe. Irma is expected to become the season’s second major hurricane — Category 3 or stronger. Irma should be in the vicinity of the Lesser Antilles in about a week.

The U.S. coast should be on high alert not just for Irma, but for other storms that could spin up quickly, closer to land.

Specifically, we’re concerned about a possible storm in the western Gulf of Mexico — near Texas — early next week. It seems likely that something will form, and it could have an impact on the Texas coast or areas farther east, sometime between Wednesday and Friday. It does not appear at this time that it would be strong, but even weak systems can produce torrential rainfall and flooding.

Here’s how the National Hurricane Center characterized this threat in their Thursday forecast:

An area of low pressure could form over the southwestern Gulf of Mexico by the weekend. Development, if any, of this system is expected to be slow to occur as the low moves slowly northward. If this system does develop, it could bring additional rainfall to portions of the Texas and Louisiana coasts. However, any rainfall forecast is uncertain at this time range, and it is too soon to determine any specific impacts. Interests in these areas should monitor the progress of this potential system for the next few days.


The National Hurricane Center says there’s a 20 percent chance a new storm will develop in the Gulf of Mexico in the next five days. (National Hurricane Center)

Hurricane Irma — still far out in the Atlantic — will remain safely over the open ocean for the next five or six days, but what people are most interested in is what is to follow. Models lose quite a bit of skill beyond a week, so their long-range output is used to look at trends and probabilities.

The two leading global models have rather different outcomes through the next 10 days. The ensembles — multiple runs of the same model but with slightly different configurations to simulate realistic uncertainty — have little overlap. This gives forecasters much less confidence in long-range outlooks.

What the ensembles do tell us: Anyone from Belize to Bermuda and points in between should be monitoring the situation closely. Also, one should be wary of relying on a single model or a single run, no matter how dramatic they may sometimes be.


Ensemble track probabilities over the next 10nbsp;days from ECMWF (top) and GFS (bottom). (B. Tang, UAlbany)

Adding the intensity information to the track, you can see an ensemble-based probability of a major hurricane being near a location through the next 10 days. This example from the European model is a recent example of that. Keep in mind that it will evolve over time.

The atmospheric steering currents that will dictate Irma’s track depend on how strong it is. A stronger “deeper” storm is steered by different layers of the atmosphere than a weak, shallow storm would be. But as is often the case, models don’t even agree on what the exact environmental pattern will be.

In the maps below, which show a forecast of where Irma could be next Thursday, the hurricane is in different positions and has different intensities. But what’s most important at this time is the huge difference in the colored contours, which represent mid-atmospheric ridges and troughs.

The European model, left, has a much stronger ridge over Irma, which forces it hundreds of miles farther south than the GFS solution. The GFS forecast will allow Irma to recurve to the north and likely miss land. The European forecast environment will absolutely impact land and possibly the United States.


500 mb height forecasts valid next Wednesday evening from ECMWF (left) and GFS (right). (tropicaltidbits.com)

All we can do now is wait and watch this storm carefully.

More Washington Post reporting on Hurricane Harvey

Harvey was a 1,000-year flood event unprecedented in scale | PHOTOS

Chemicals ignite at flooded plant in Texas | GALLERY

Scammers are using robo-calls about insurance to fleece survivors

 

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS