Apple apologizes for iPhone slowdown drama, will offer $29 battery replacements for a year
December 29, 2017 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
Comments Off
Apple just published a letter to customers apologizing for the “misunderstanding” around older iPhones being slowed down, following its recent admission that it was, in fact, slowing down older phones in order to compensate for degrading batteries. “We know that some of you feel Apple has let you down,” says the company. “We apologize.”
Apple says in its letter that batteries are “consumable components,” and is offering anyone with an iPhone 6 or later a battery replacement for $29 starting in late January through December 2018 — a discount of $50 from the usual replacement cost. Apple’s also promising to add features to iOS that provide more information about the battery health in early 2018, so that users are aware of when their batteries are no longer capable of supporting maximum phone performance. This is a significant change in attitude around iPhone batteries — a decade ago, when the first iPhone came out, Apple said most iPhone users would never need to replace their batteries.
iPhone owners have long believed Apple artificially slows down older phones to drive new sales. But the new information from Apple about performance management poured gasoline on that long-simmering frustration, leading to a lot of bad press and multiple lawsuits. What made it all seem worse is that the scope of the performance penalty only came to light after being discovered by a developer instead of being clearly disclosed by Apple.
The iPhone 6, 6S, SE, and 7 have much slower peak performance as they get older and their batteries aren’t able to provide as much power to the processor. Apple had actually announced this change to performance along with iOS 10.2.1 a year ago, as the fix to a problem with the iPhone 6 that caused unexpected shutdowns if older batteries couldn’t provide enough power to the processor. But it wasn’t transparent about the performance penalty, and the new benchmarks suggest the penalty is much more significant than previously believed.
For its part, Apple continues to insist that it’s never artificially slowed down phones — just that it’s aggressively managing phone performance to maximize the lifespan of iPhone batteries. “This feature’s only intent is to prevent unexpected shutdowns so that the iPhone can still be used,” according to a new knowledge base article Apple published alongside today’s letter. “This power management works by looking at a combination of the device temperature, battery state of charge, and the battery’s impedance. Only if these variables require it, iOS will dynamically manage the maximum performance of some system components, such as the CPU and GPU in order to prevent unexpected shutdowns.”
Processor speed is just one piece of the battery- and performance-management puzzle, according to Apple: iPhones with older batteries may also more aggressively dim their screens, have lower maximum speaker volumes, and even have their camera flashes disabled when the system needs more peak power than the battery can provide. But other core features, like the cell radio, GPS, and camera quality, aren’t affected, Apple says. The whole approach actually quite clever, but cleverness isn’t a great substitute for speed.
In any event, Apple has a long way to go rebuilding trust with its customers — this story broke well past the tech press and hit TV morning shows and local news with zero nuance about “smoothing instantaneous peaks” and battery chemistry degradation. A lot of people already believed that Apple slowed down their iPhones, and this wave of news was a big data point confirming that for them. It’s going to be a difficult road back.
In its letter, Apple says “we’ve always wanted our customers to be able to use their iPhones as long as possible.” If Apple is serious about that, and equally serious about the battery being a consumable, these first two steps are just the beginning of a major reset in the way we think about maintaining the most important devices in our lives.
Share and Enjoy
Alabama Certifies Jones Win, Brushing Aside Challenge From Roy Moore
December 29, 2017 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
Comments Off
On Thursday, Mr. Moore seemed to come close to acknowledging his loss. “I have stood for the truth about God and the Constitution for the people of Alabama,” he said in a statement. “I have no regrets. To God be the glory.”
Before the results of the Dec. 12 special election were certified, and in the candidate’s statement afterward, Mr. Moore and his campaign left little doubt about their assessment of the vote.
In a lawsuit filed in a state court late Wednesday, Mr. Moore, who denied the allegations of sexual impropriety, complained that pervasive fraud had tainted the election, and that the Alabama authorities had inadequately investigated potential misconduct.
But Mr. Moore found himself aligned against Democrats and Republicans alike. Secretary of State John H. Merrill, a Republican who voted for Mr. Moore, said he had found no evidence of endemic fraud and refused to postpone the certification. Judge Johnny Hardwick of Montgomery County Circuit Court, citing a lack of jurisdiction, dismissed Mr. Moore’s complaint minutes before the vote was certified.
Mr. Jones, whose transition team had called the lawsuit “a desperate attempt by Roy Moore to subvert the will of the people,” said in a statement that his victory “marks a new chapter for our state and the nation.”
Although the state ultimately certified the results, Mr. Moore’s litigation infused a strain of drama into a day that Alabama officials had hoped would be procedural and perfunctory. Mr. Moore’s lawsuit was late in coming: His lawyers filed their lawsuit at 10:33 p.m. on Wednesday. .
Yet the complaint by Mr. Moore, a figure with a penchant for last-minute legal theatrics, was not altogether surprising. He and his allies have spent the last several weeks signaling their unease with the voting process, and, while saying little else publicly, Mr. Moore solicited contributions for an “election integrity fund.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Until Wednesday night, it was not clear what would come of his efforts. Then, in a court filing that ran for dozens of pages, Mr. Moore argued that returns in the state’s most populous county “confirmed election fraud.” It also said that turnout in the county was suspiciously high; it suggested that Mr. Jones had benefited from voter intimidation; and it argued that Mr. Moore’s opponents had spread “lies and fraudulent misrepresentations.”
To support his arguments, Mr. Moore included affidavits from several people his campaign described as experts in elections; one has claimed to have “mathematically proved a conspiracy to assassinate” President John F. Kennedy. (Mr. Moore has himself indulged in conspiracy theories, including that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States.)
Experts unaffiliated with either the Jones or Moore campaigns quickly said the lawsuit’s arguments appeared meritless.
Newsletter Sign Up
Continue reading the main story
Thank you for subscribing.
An error has occurred. Please try again later.
You are already subscribed to this email.
“It seems to boil down to: I should have won under the exit poll and all of this voting by African-Americans must show fraud,” Richard L. Hasen, an elections law expert at the University of California, Irvine, wrote on his blog.
Although the Alabama Republican Party, and many elected officials, stood behind Mr. Moore during his campaign, he had few influential allies by the time the certification meeting began at the Capitol. Party leaders, including President Trump, who endorsed Mr. Moore, had called for him to concede.
Mr. Moore could conceivably ask the Senate, which has the constitutional authority to serve as “judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members,” not to seat Mr. Jones. Republican leaders in Washington are unlikely to heed any such call.
But the final tally reflects Mr. Moore’s enduring appeal to many Republicans here, and Mr. Moore’s strength, diminished as it is, has fueled speculation about whether he will unsettle the state’s politics next year.
Santa and SpongeBob Helped Doug Jones Win. Here’s How.
There were more than 22,000 write-in votes cast in the Alabama Senate race. That number exceeded the margin of Doug Jones’s victory. Republicans, unwilling to cross party lines, but unhappy with Roy S. Moore, presumably wrote in these names.
By CHRIS CIRILLO on Publish Date December 28, 2017.
Photo by Audra Melton for The New York Times.
Watch in Times Video »
A campaign for either governor or attorney general would involve challenging a Republican incumbent and would test just how weary and wary the party is of Mr. Moore.
“On paper, he would be competitive in a Republican primary,” said State Auditor Jim Zeigler, a Republican who supported Mr. Moore in the Senate election and is himself considering a run for governor. “But the campaign is not won or lost on paper, just like a football game. On paper, Alabama was going to beat Auburn, and it didn’t happen.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
The political math for Mr. Moore is certainly more complicated than ever before.
He was twice elected — and effectively twice removed — as chief justice, and he would enter any 2018 race with some of the advantages that can come with decades in public life: name recognition and, likely, the sustained fealty of the devoted supporters who helped him earn more than 650,000 votes on Dec. 12.
But before the Senate race, many of Mr. Moore’s critics regarded him as bigot and a demagogue who cheered discrimination against gay people and Muslims. After the campaign, some of his critics also saw him as a predator toward younger women. And the coalition that sunk Mr. Moore’s campaign — young people, women and black voters in major cities and rural counties — has not gone away.
If Mr. Moore harbors any ambitions of moving into the neoclassical Governor’s Mansion, he will have to act on them quickly: The deadline for declaring a statewide candidacy is Feb. 9.
Several of Mr. Moore’s advisers, including his campaign’s chairman and treasurer, did not respond to messages this week. But a former chief of staff to Mr. Moore, Ben Dupré, said that Mr. Moore is “a guy that does not compromise.”
“He doesn’t take his orders from the Republican Party or the Democrat Party,” said Mr. Dupré, who sometimes spoke for Mr. Moore during the campaign but ended his role soon after the election. “He really believes in following the Constitution and in following God and in following what he believes is his duty to God and to the country.”
Mr. Dupré added, “If he has a reason not to concede, he’s not going to concede. He’s got no friends in D.C. — we know that, we knew that going into this — and he’s not trying to play their game of, ‘Oh, we smeared your reputation, so you should roll over and go away.’”
Mr. Dupré, who spoke hours before Mr. Moore brought his lawsuit, may have a point.
After Mr. Moore faltered in 2006, a political scientist predicted to an Alabama newspaper that it would be “very hard for him to come back and be a major force in Alabama politics.”
Less than seven years later, Mr. Moore, already ousted once from the Supreme Court, was elected chief justice — again.
Continue reading the main story