Why Isn’t Kindle Promoting Its Social Networking Features?
August 9, 2011 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
Amazon added Twitter and Facebook sharing to the Kindle in 2010 and later added those features to its apps as well. Kindle.Amazon.com is a fairly bare-bones page “dedicated to making reading better by bringing readers together and by helping them to learn more from the books that they read. You can follow people of interest to you to see their Public Notes and reading activities, and review your books, highlights, and notes.” Note that Amazon is pretty adamant about not calling this a social networking site—or even giving it a title other than its web address.
See more of our latest Kindle coverage
or add an alert for future coverage of Kindle.
Also, it does not seem that Amazon is behind the buzz about the site. The company has not issued a press release or more casually mentioned the site on Facebook, for instance. Rather, former MySpace president Tom Anderson mentioned the site on Google+ yesterday (”It sorta looks like Amazon has just launched a social network”) and the “news” spread from there. (As blogger Phil Bradley pointed out, perhaps the most noteworthy thing here is that news actually spread from Google+ to Twitter.)
Competing e-reader makers have been a little chattier about social and sharing features. The new Kobo has the company’s social networking technology, Reading Life, built into it and the company used that as a major selling point at launch. When Barnes Noble (NYSE: BKS) released the new Nook, it said it would launch MyNook.com, through which users could access their libraries and see friends’ recommendations, by June—but that has not happened. http://www.mynook.com simply redirects to Barnes Noble’s homepage.
Why are Amazon and Barnes Noble so subdued about these features? I’ve asked both companies for comment and will update this post when I hear back. in the meantime, theories: In the case of MyNook.com, BN may simply have gotten delayed…or decided the effort isn’t worth it. (After all, there are a lot of social networking reading sites, like Goodreads, already.)
As for Amazon, it could be quietly building and testing its social networking presence in preparation for the rumored-slash-pretty-much-definitely-happening releases of two new Kindles and the Amazon tablet this fall—devices that might integrate social features more prominently.
By Laura Hazard Owen
@laurahazardowen
Aug 8, 2011 12:25 PM ET
Photo:
Corbis / Victor Habbick Visions
Posted In:
Media Publishing, Books, e-readers, Companies, Amazon, Kindle, barnes noble, kobo, nook
Share and Enjoy
India Wants Special Monitoring Access for Twitter, Facebook
August 9, 2011 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
India’s communications ministry has been asked by the home ministry to monitor social networking websites such as Twitter and Facebook amid fears that the services are being used by terrorists to plan attacks.
The request suggests that the Indian government is trying to broaden the scope of its online surveillance for national security.
Telecommunications service providers in India provide facilities for lawful interception and monitoring of communications on their network, including communications from social networking websites such as Facebook and Twitter, in accordance with their license agreements, Milind Deora, the minister of state for communications and IT, told Parliament, according to the country’s Press Information Bureau.
But there are certain communications which are encrypted, Deora said Friday.
The government did not provide details of what encrypted data they would like to have access to. A spokesman for the home ministry said on Monday that additional information can only be provided in Parliament while it is in session.
Under new rules to the country’s IT Act that came into force earlier this year, websites and service providers are required to provide government security agencies with information on private accounts, including passwords, on request without a court order.
Most companies, however, are not willing to share information with law enforcement agencies unless they have a court order.
Twitter states in its guidelines for law enforcement that “non-public information about Twitter users is not released unless we have received a subpoena, court order, or other valid legal process document.”
Facebook has a similar policy, saying that U.S. federal law prohibits the disclosure of the contents of an account such as messages, wall posts and photos except in response to a civil subpoena or court order, the company said on its website.
Twitter and Facebook, which both rank in the top 10 most popular websites in India according to web statistics company Alexa, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The Indian government has said it has asked other companies to provide ways to allow security agencies to monitor traffic on their networks, including Skype and Google, although those companies said they have not heard from the government.
India continues to press other companies for access to communications data. The government has asked Research in Motion, maker of BlackBerry devices, to provide access to e-mails and other communications on its corporate service, Blackberry Enterprise Server.
RIM has said that it is technically impossible for it to provide security agencies with access to encrypted e-mails, as the keys used to scramble the messages are in the hands of its customers.
Last week, a Parliament Standing Committee criticized the government for extending the deadlines for RIM to provide access to the communications. The committee recommended that the matter “should be taken up strongly with BlackBerry.”
John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John’s e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com