Facebook kills daily Facebook Deals, keeps Check-in Deals alive
August 27, 2011 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
Facebook quietly announced that it is killing its Facebook Deals product. After four months of testing, the social networking giant is calling it quits. This may ease some competitive pressure on industry leaders Groupon and LivingSocial, according to Reuters.
“After testing Deals for four months, we’ve decided to end our Deals product in the coming weeks,” a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement. “We think there is a lot of power in a social approach to driving people into local businesses. We remain committed to building products to help local businesses connect with people, like Ads, Pages, Sponsored Stories, and Check-in Deals. We’ve learned a lot from our test and we’ll continue to evaluate how to best serve local businesses.”
Wait Emil! When you told us earlier this week that Facebook had killed Facebook Places, you said that Check-in Deals wasn’t going away anytime soon. Don’t worry, that’s still correct. It’s important to note that there is a distinction between Check-in Deals (alive) and and Facebook Deals (dead).
In November 2010, Facebook announced Check-in Deals, a subset of Facebook Places. It allows you to check in from restaurants, supermarkets, bars, and coffee shops using an app. In turn, you are rewarded with discounts, coupons, and free merchandise. This product is still going to be around for the foreseeable future. It will be, however, changed slightly given that Facebook Places is being killed (see my previous article to learn how this will work).
In April 2011, Facebook announced a pilot program for Facebook Deals, offering online coupons and discounts from local businesses. Facebook started making offers in five cities (San Francisco, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, and Atlanta) and then recently added three more (Charlotte, St. Louis, and Minneapolis). The social networking giant had a small sales team arranging deals with local merchants but also ran offers set up by 11 other daily deal companies. This product is now dead.
All this product axing is being announced right after Facebook started rolling out a major privacy revamp this week. More details are available at the links below.
See also:
- Facebook moves privacy controls inline, simplifies sharing
- Facebook kills Places, but emphasizes location sharing more
- Security experts have mixed feelings about Facebook’s privacy revamp
- Facebook digs at Google with updated privacy controls
- Facebook offers new privacy policy for regular people
Share and Enjoy
Facebook, Twitter Could Compromise Undercover Operations, Says Australian …
August 27, 2011 by admin
Filed under Lingerie Events
3 comment(s) – last by drycrust3.. on Aug 27 at 1:50 PM
Recipient E-mail
Sender E-mail
Please input the letters/numbers that appear in the image below. (not case-sensitive)
(Source: tednguyenusa.com)
The problem with a police officer’s identity being displayed on these networks is that it can compromise a covert operation and ultimately the safety of the officers involved
Facebook has alarmed several users and regulators with some of its features, such as facial recognition technology, due to privacy issues. Now, Australian police officers worry that social networking sites with features such as photo tagging could place them in danger.
Mick Keelty, a former Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner, says he’s concerned that a police officer’s identity being placed on the Internet through social networking could pose a threat to their safety.
At a recent conference in Sydney, Australia called Security 2011, Keelty mentioned that he is engaging in research associated with the policy implications of social networking for undercover operations by police officers.
One of his most recent studies was conducted with the New South Wales (NSW) police between December 2010 and February 2011.
“We surveyed them to try and measure the extent of exposure they already had in having their photos uploaded to the Internet,” said Keelty. “The results found that 90 percent of female officers were using social media compared with 81 percent of males.”
Facebook was the most popular social network, and Twitter took second place.
The problem with a police officer’s identity being displayed on these networks is that it can compromise a covert operation and ultimately the safety of the officers involved.
“You can’t just immerse an officer into a crime group; it takes up to seven years to get them into the right place [in the gang] where they can feed back the intelligence that you need,” said Keelty. “Then there is the cost of doing that such as when the AFP targets motorcycle gangs or when governments across the world have entered into agreements to place critical witnesses in prosecution matters in different parts of the world to hide them.”
Keelty further explained that 16-year-old’s who have Facebook’s now and want to be police officers when they’re older are at risk because these photos have already been exposed. Even if they’re taken down or removed by Facebook (which, Facebook only started allowing after Google+ started removing photos for those requesting it), there’s still the chance of that person’s friends or family posting pictures of them. Photo tagging and facial recognition technology only make the matter worse.
“It’s too late [for them to take it down] because once it’s uploaded, it’s there forever,” said Keelty. “If you have someone in the service who is trying to remain anonymous for whatever reason, it is still possible through other relationships to find them.”
According to Keelty’s survey, 85 percent of participants had photos of themselves uploaded by other people.
The survey results will be considered in future policy guidelines for police agencies.