Friday, November 8, 2024

Trump pulls back threat to shut down government over border wall — for now

September 2, 2017 by  
Filed under Latest Lingerie News

Comments Off

The White House has signaled to congressional Republicans that it will not shut down the government in October if money isn’t appropriated to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, potentially clearing a path for lawmakers to reach a short-term budget deal.

Congress has only appropriated money to fund government operations through the end of September, and President Trump has threatened to shut down the government if lawmakers don’t include $1.6 billion in new funding so that 74 new miles of wall and secondary fencing can be added to the border.

“Build that wall,” Trump said at the Aug. 22 rally in Phoenix. “Now the obstructionist Democrats would like us not to do it. But believe me, if we have to close down our government, we’re building that wall.”

But two days later, White House officials quietly notified Congress that the $1.6 billion would not need to be in a “continuing resolution” that was meant to fund government operations from October until sometime in early December, a senior GOP congressional aide said.


A view of the metal fence along the border in Sonoyta, Sonora state, northern Mexico, between the Altar desert in Mexico and the Arizona desert in the United States. (Pedro Pardo/AFP/Getty Images)

White House officials have signaled to lawmakers, however, that the wall’s eventual construction remains a top priority for Trump. He wants this funding to be included in the December budget bill, GOP congressional aides said.

Trump could still follow through on a threat to shut down the government in December, but this marks the second time he has pulled back from the wall demand to allow lawmakers to pass a budget bill. The first time came in May, when lawmakers voted to authorize government funding through September and refrained from including money that would allow for the construction of a new wall. That law, however, did allow the U.S. government to replace existing border wall with a new barrier where necessary.

Trump has been threatening to shut down the government for months. In May, he said in another tweet that the government needed a “good shutdown” to break the gridlock in Congress.

Trump and White House  budget director Mick Mulvaney have stressed repeatedly to Congress that the wall money must be appropriated, and the House of Representatives approved a bill in late July that would fund the government and included $1.6 billion for the wall construction. But the Senate refused to take up that bill, in part because Senate GOP leaders knew Democrats would not support it and they needed support from Democrats to bring a new spending measure up for a vote.

There were other worries.

Congress needs to raise the debt ceiling by Sept. 29, or Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has warned that he might not have enough flexibility to pay all of the government’s bill. Because those deadlines were so close, Mnuchin and other White House officials did not want a fight over the budget to become entangled with a measure to raise the debt ceiling.

Even some of the White House’s most ardent supporters in Congress agreed that now was not the time to risk a government shutdown over the wall money.

“Obviously I’m supportive of the wall and putting the wall funding in [the government funding bill], but from a pragmatic standpoint, even if we pass a [bill] that has the wall funding in there, it will get stripped out in the Senate,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R – N.C.), chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, which represents the chamber’s most conservative members.

Meadows said he would vote for a spending bill that included funding for the wall “but you can’t be intellectually honest and believe that this fight is going to happen in September.”

Now, congressional leaders plan to introduce a bill that would essentially finance government operations at existing levels from Oct. 1 into some time in December. Such a bill would require support from Senate Democrats to pass, and many Democrats oppose construction of the border wall.

That’s one reason many Republicans in Congress have told Trump to focus on other parts of his agenda and postpone having a fight about constructing the border wall for now.

If Trump decided to veto a funding bill passed by Congress, it would lead to a partial government shutdown. National parks would close, and many government agencies would send employees home without pay, causing delays at Social Security, the Internal Revenue Service, and at numerous other agencies. The last time there was a government shutdown was in 2013.

Building a wall along the Mexico border was one of Trump’s biggest promises during his campaign, often thrilling his supporters at rallies with chants of “Build That Wall.” A key part of the promise, however, was that Mexico would pay for the wall’s construction. Mexican officials have refused to play any part of paying for the wall, leading Trump to insist that the money first come from the U.S. Congress so that construction can begin.

– Mike DeBonis contributed to this report.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Trump-Cohn Romance Is Officially Dead

September 2, 2017 by  
Filed under Latest Lingerie News

Comments Off

People who know Gary Cohn were first surprised, then relieved, when he announced that he would be joining the Trump administration. For one, Cohn has been a life-long Democrat. For another, the former Goldman Sachs president was known as a direct, no-nonsense operator whose management style would seem to conflict with Donald Trump’s preference for chaos. Banks like Goldman Sachs had, in fact, shunned Trump’s business for years, refusing to lend him money. On the campaign trail, Trump railed against Goldman Sachs and even dropped an allegedly anti-Semitic advertisement painting Goldman C.E.O. Lloyd Blankfein’s as the face of a “global power structure responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class.”

But at least Cohn would be a moderating force and a steady hand in an administration sorely lacking in both, the thinking went. (“Trump loves having Goldman guys around,” a source told Gabriel Sherman last December. “The bank wouldn’t touch Trump, and now they’re working for him.”) For a while, the former real-estate developer was almost deferential toward Cohn, who had “walk-in privileges” and was allowed to interrupt Trump to offer his take on a situation. Trump reportedly loved that Cohn was a “guy’s guy,” and the fact that he had the experience of running an organization that employed thousands of people, plus a “self-assured confidence” put him at the top of Trump’s list of trusted associates, just below those related to him.

Unfortunately, like many Trump romances, this one has hit the skids. Trump quickly proved to be the sort of undisciplined employee who would’ve been fired from Goldman Sachs on day one. He withdrew the United States from the Paris climate agreement, despite Cohn’s protestations. The breaking point was Charlottesville: Cohn was said to be “disgusted” and “dismayed” at his boss’s characterization of a group containing neo-Nazis as having some “very fine people,” and, after two weeks of stewing, let his thoughts be known in an interview with the Financial Times, wherein he condemned the president’s equivocating. Not surprisingly, it did not go over well.

The Washington Post reports that Trump is “simmering with displeasure over what he considers personal disloyalty from Cohn.” While he has so far resisted his impulses to fire the National Economic Council director, knowing that Cohn is effectively the face of the White House’s tax-reform effort, he has “found other ways to slight him,” including using the beginning of his tax speech in Missouri on Wednesday to give shout-outs to “the many distinguished guests” present but failing to mention Cohn. And because this is a family business, the Post notes that Ivanka Trump, who, along with her husband, Jared Kushner, was influential in bringing Cohn into the fold, “tweeted a call for tax reform with a picture of Trump backstage flanked by her and Mnuchin.  Notably absent was Cohn.”

If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

Asked later about the state of the Cohn-Trump relationship aboard Air Force One, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders  told reporters only that the two were committed to passing tax-reform legislation. Meanwhile, Trump has apparently been making calls “on his personal phone” to former White House strategist and Cohn-nemesis Steve Bannon, when Chief of Staff John Kelly isn’t around:

Trump chafes at some of the retired Marine Corps general’s moves to restrict access to him since he took the job almost a month ago, said several people close to the president. They run counter to Trump’s love of spontaneity and brashness, prompting some Trump loyalists to derisively dub Kelly “the church lady” because they consider him strict and morally superior.

“He’s having a very hard time,” one friend who spoke with Trump this week said of the president. “He doesn’t like the way the media’s handling him. He doesn’t like how Kelly’s handling him. He’s turning on people that are very close to him.”

That’s not great news for Wall Street, which has put its faith in Cohn and Kelly to keep the president calm, collected, and contained as Congress attempts to reform the tax code for the first time in 30 years. The market rally—not to mention peace in East Asia—depends on it. 
 
Cohn, for his part, has been reduced to making the usual hostage statements that tend to follow Trump feuds. During an appearance on CNBC Friday, Cohn said, “I have a great relationship with the president. . . . He and I are spending time working together on all the big economic issues that are going to drive economic growth and drive wages in this country. That’s what he cares about, that’s what I care about.” A White House spokeswoman told the Post, “Gary is here. The president is here.”

Treasury inspector general wants info on Mnuchin’s #daytrip with his wife

Earlier this month, Louise Linton, wife of Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, cemented her place in Trumpworld as the official Real Housewife of the Trump administration. Posting a photo to Instagram of her #daytrip to Kentucky with Mnuchin aboard a government plane, Linton made sure to hashtag all of the designer clothes on her person, among them #tomfordsunnies, #valetino, #roulandmouret, #hermes. Things went downhill from there when, after receiving an arguably deserved comment questioning her judgment, she laced into the stranger by bragging about how rich she is, claiming she’s sacrificed more for this country than most ever will and, amazingly, calling the woman—later identified as a mother of three from Oregon—“adorably out of touch.” Later, as the backlash built, Linton apologized for her “inappropriate” commentary and clarified that she and her husband would be reimbursing the government for the trip. But like an arc on a reality TV show that cannot be wrapped up neatly in one episode, this story is not over.

Politico reports that #daytrip is now being investigated by the Treasury’s inspector general. Counsel Rich Delmar said late Thursday night that the office is “reviewing the circumstances of the secretary’s August 21 flight . . . to determine whether all applicable travel, ethics, and appropriation laws and policies were observed.” According to The Washington Post, Treasury secretaries and other Cabinet members who are not involved with national security have “traditionally flown on government planes only on rare occasions, including international trips, while taking commercial airlines for other domestic travel.” While Cabinet officials like Mnuchin may request a government-sponsored flight for “specific criteria,” the Department of Defense policy describes it as “a premium mode of travel involving high costs and limited resources” and encourages government employees to make “every effort . . . to minimize travel cost.”

Separately, the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Treasury Department for information about the trip, suggesting that it was planned so that Mnuchin and Linton would have an optimal view of last month’s solar eclipse. A spokesperson for the Treasury Department responded that “the eclipse did not even factor in the travel decision.”

Republicans may not be able to nuke the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that easily…

. . . Not because they don’t have a friend in Trump, who deems most government regulation, and particularly financial regulation born out of the Dodd-Frank Act (“a disaster!”), is an abomination that’s hurting his “friends”, but because ordinary Americans generally love the C.F.P.B. Per The New York Times:

At one point, contemplating a high-profile run on the agency, the White House examined polling data from political bellwether states, two people briefed on the matter said. The agency, they concluded, was too popular to pick a public fight with. Republicans in Congress, who have vehemently opposed the agency since its creation, have also not been able to muster enough support to derail its work. Efforts to strike down a rule ordering new consumer protections on prepaid debit cards never made it to a vote in either the House or the Senate.

“The public does not share the G.O.P.’s ire toward the agency or its mission,” policy analyst Dean Clancy told the Times. “It is an agency about protecting the little guy, and that is tough to oppose.” (The House, for its part, has of course tried, passing the Financial Choice Act in June, which would give the president the power to fire the director of the C.F.P.B. and vastly curb its oversight power.)

Jobs reports miss

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Friday that the U.S. economy added 156,000 jobs last month, fewer than the 180,000 economists had expected. The unemployment rate, which had been at a 16-year low of 4.3 percent, inched up to 4.4 percent. Trump, who said the unemployment rate couldn’t be trusted when Barack Obama was president and then suddenly started trusting it once he moved into the White House, offered no commentary on the news on Twitter.

Elsewhere!

U.S. Hiring Slows in August, Unemployment Rate Ticks Up (W.S.J.)

U.S. C.E.O.s Urge Trump to Keep DACA “Dreamers” Program (Bloomberg)

Harvey’s Toll on U.S. Gas Market May Not Emerge Until Next Week (Bloomberg)

The obscure economist Silicon Valley billionaires should dump Ayn Rand for (The Hive)

Wells Fargo Accounts Accord Called into Question as Victims Grow (Bloomberg)

Steven Cohen Raises Eyebrows by Using Auditor to Sell Fund Assets Holding Up SEC Settlement (MarketWatch)

The Job-Stealing Robot Apocalypse May Be Worse Than Previously Thought (The Hive)

Investor Who Sank Valeant Thinks a Bitcoin Fund Is the “Most Dangerous”(MarketWatch)

Trump Errantly Faves Tweet Saying He’s “Just Not Presidential Material”(N.Y. Mag)

Follow to get the latest news and analysis about the players in your inbox.

See All Players

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS