Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut with a tweet about a secretary saving $1.50 a week

February 5, 2018 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

Never mind all the Democrats who call the GOP’s tax bill a deficit-busting giveaway to the rich; House Speaker Paul D. Ryan has been enthusiastically promoting it as a middle-class tax windfall.

He’s been coaching other Republican lawmakers to sell the $1.5 trillion tax cut to voters, and telling people on Twitter to check their paychecks for wage hikes. The bill — which was deeply unpopular when it passed along party lines in December — is now breaking even in a new opinion poll.

So Saturday morning, by way of good news, Ryan’s Twitter account shared a story about a secretary taking home a cool $6 a month in tax savings.

Here is the passage in the Associated Press:

Julia Ketchum, a secretary at a public high school in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, said she was pleasantly surprised her pay went up $1.50 a week. She didn’t think her pay would go up at all, let alone this soon. That adds up to $78 a year, which she said will more than cover her Costco membership for the year.

The tweet was deleted within hours, probably guaranteeing it will never be forgotten, and leaving people baffled as to why Ryan ever thought it would make a good advertisement for the tax plan’s supposed middle-class benefit.

It’s true that the bill is stingy to people at the bottom of the pay scale. In fact, the average tax break for someone making $25,400 a year or less happens to be $60 — the exact price of a Gold Star Costco membership.

And it’s true that the bill showers money on those in the top income brackets. But between these extremes, millions of workers should see substantial cuts, ranging into the hundreds and thousands of dollars.

For example, the very same AP story Ryan quoted from also cited a care worker in Florida who got an extra $200 in his last paycheck, and a couple in Texas who will save enough to cover the costs of a new baby.

Why the House Speaker decided to highlight Julia Ketchum of Lancaster, Pa., and her $1.50 a week savings, the world may never know.

Neither Ryan’s office nor Ketchum could be reached for comment. But in an interview with CBS News, the school secretary wondered why Ryan had chosen her anecdote of all possible examples. “He may not have read the whole article,” she said.

Not that hundreds of people dragging Ryan over his tweet seem that interested in finding out. The most common responses can be placed into three neat categories, below:

There are more like this, but you get the idea.

While it’s hard to be sure, since President Trump refuses to release his income tax records, The Washington Post has written that he stands to save millions of dollars through the bill he promoted and signed.

Millions of dollars compares very favorably against $1.50 a week, as people on Twitter are now discovering.

Likewise $1.50 vs. $500,000 — the latter amount being what GOP financier Charles Koch and his wife reported donated to Ryan’s fundraising committee days after the tax bill passed.

Finally, $1.50 compared poorly against the untold government programs, staff or resources that will have to be cut in the future to pay for those hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings.

All of which is to say that even if Ryan’s tweet was only up for a few hours, jokes aside, it could end up haunting Republicans in the November election. House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi — among others in her party — have already figured this out:

This story has been updated.

Read more:

‘I’m really not to blame’: Fired Hawaii worker says false missile threat was ‘system failure’

Maya civilization was much vaster than known, thousands of newly discovered structures reveal

Curiosity’s five-year journey across Mars — in one stunning photo

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

House Intelligence Dem: Use of Steele dossier in FISA application ‘small and insignificant’

February 5, 2018 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

Rep. Jim HimesJames (Jim) Andres HimesSeveral lawmakers have seen intelligence behind Nunes memo Dem rep: Firing Comey ‘more serious’ than wanting to fire Mueller GOP fuels ‘secret society’ talk with FBI text messages MORE (D-Conn.) on Sunday disputed Republican claims based on a recently declassified memo that the Department of Justice depended on the so-called Steele dossier to obtain a surveillance warrant on a Trump campaign aide.

“Just because it was opposition research doesn’t mean that it’s wrong. In fact, we wouldn’t pay a penny for opposition research if it is biased. I think when the facts are out here, this will turn out to be a very, very small and insignificant thing,” Himes, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

The four-page memo, released Friday by the House Intelligence Committee, accuses senior Justice Department officials of improperly using information from the Steele dossier — which originated as an opposition research document during the 2016 campaign and was partly funded by the Democratic National Committee — to obtain surveillance warrants on Carter Page, a member of the Trump transition team and former Trump campaign adviser. 

Some Republicans and President TrumpDonald John TrumpSchiff: Nunes gave Trump ‘secretly altered’ version of memo Davis: ‘Deep state’ existed in ’16 – but it elected Trump Former Trump legal spokesman to testify to Mueller about undisclosed call: report MORE have pointed to the memo as proof the Justice Department’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election is biased against the president.

Democrats have blasted the document as a collection of misleading claims that seek to undermine the FBI, and called for the House Intelligence Committee to release a countermemo from the minority party.

Himes on Sunday pushed back against the Republican claim that the probe into Russian interference is tainted because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant was supported in part by the dossier.

“What we are going to learn if and when the Democratic memo is released, what we will learn is that it is not true that this FISA warrant was awarded solely on the basis of the Steele dossier. We will also learn that the FBI, because they’re very careful people, didn’t mislead the judge,” Himes said. 

Rep. Brad WenstrupBrad Robert WenstrupGOP lawmaker who treated train injuries discusses the accident GOP lawmakers help people injured in train crash When it comes to treating depression, ‘step therapy’ is a costly misstep MORE (R-Ohio), who also serves on the House Intelligence Committee, said on the same show that he didn’t want to release the Democratic countermemo alongside the Republican memo because it had not been vetted, which Himes disputed.

“If there was a vetting process on the Nunes memo, that’s news to me. And if the vetting process did occur, we know what FBI and [the Justice Department] said,” Himes said, referencing concerns expressed by both agencies about the Republican document.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS