Gunman at Veterans Home of California in Yountville has 3 hostages; no contact with shooter

Video

Police: Active shooter, hostage situation at veterans home

Reports of shot fired in Yountville, California; witnesses say suspect is armed with military-style weapon and possibly wearing body armor.

An armed man took three hostages during an “active shooter situation” at a California veterans home Friday afternoon, officials confirmed, enacting a lockdown of the facility.

Authorities have not had any confirmed communication with the suspect since around 10:30 a.m., California Highway Patrol spokesman Sgt. Robert Nacke said during a brief evening news conference.

Authorities received a call of shots fired at the Yountville veterans home, described as the largest such facility in the country, at 10:20 a.m. prompting several law enforcement agencies to respond, Assistant Chief Chris Childs, of the CHP’s Golden Gate Division, said during an earlier news conference.

Within four minutes, a Napa County Sheriff’s deputy arrived at the scene and encountered the suspect in one of the buildings, Childs said. Gunfire was exchanged.

“It’s not known at this time how many rounds were exchanged but I am happy to report that as of this moment, there have been no injuries,” he said.

The suspect is contained to one room, along with his three hostages, Childs said. Hostage negotiators from at least three agencies are at the scene, waiting to make contact with the individual.

Brian Goder, a resident of the veterans home who was under lockdown for hours in the main dining room of the veterans home, told The Associated Press that he saw more than a dozen armed troops walking to the building in which the suspect and hostages are located. The soldiers could be seen in a video he posted on Facebook, but it wasn’t immediately clear what agency they were from.

Also not immediately known: the suspect’s motives and his identity, which had yet to be publicly released.

A gunman is holding three people hostage inside the Yountville veterans home in California, police said.

 (KTVU)

The hostages are reportedly not veterans home employees, but rather Pathway Home employees, a privately run program on the veterans home’s grounds. That group “serves post-9/11 veterans affected by deployment-related stress,” according to the Pathway Homes website.

In an interview with The AP, Larry Kamer said his wife, Devereaux Smith, a fundraiser for the nonprofit Pathway Home, told him by phone that the gunman had slipped quietly into an employee going-away party and staff meeting at the home. Some people were reportedly permitted to leave while others were taken hostage. Kamer said his wife is now inside the home’s dining hall and is not allowed to leave.

Childs characterized the situation as “very active and dynamic.”

The California Highway Patrol has assumed primary investigative jurisdiction over the  situation because the veterans home is a state-owned facility, he said.

Napa County Sheriff John Robertson said authorities know who the suspect is, but he declined to provide a name. There have been several attempts to make contact with the individual since 10:30 a.m. by both cellphone and phones in the facility, he said.

Robertson added that he knows none of the deputies were injured but did not have an official status on the condition of the hostages. The suspect did release some people, he said, but kept the three people he is currently holding.

In all, 15 to 20 shots went off at the facility, police said, according to KTVU.

CHP Officer John Fransen told the outlet the sprawling property was evacuated after reports came in about an armed man on the grounds and law enforcement was working to build a secure perimeter.

Several law enforcement agencies responded to the hostage scene.

 (KTVU)

“We do have an active shooter situation with a hostage situation in Yountville,” Fransen told KTVU.

A number of ambulances, fire trucks and an armored police vehicle were seen at the property.

A group of about 80 students who were on the home’s grounds were safely evacuated after being locked down, the sheriff said. The teens from Justin-Siena High School were at a theater there, rehearsing a play.

“They were a distance away from the shooting situation,” Robertson said.

Some of the children were driven away on school buses and others in cars.

The CHP is aware of the incident at the Yountville Veterans Home and has officers and aerial resources on scene working with Napa County Sheriff’s deputies and others to bring the situation to a safe conclusion. A CHP SWAT team is also enroute. More details as info is available.

— CHP Headquarters (@CHP_HQ) March 9, 2018

Earlier in the afternoon, The Press Democrat reported that family members of workers and residents were at the scene, anxiously awaiting word. Fernando Juarez, 36, of Napa said his 22-year-old sister Vanessa Flores is a caregiver at the facility and was exchanging texts with family while sheltering in place with a client.

Flores told family she could hear people yelling “Get down! Get down!” She also asked her brother to ensure her 3-year-old son is taken care of if she should not survive the ordeal.

“I’m trying to be calm,” Juarez said.

According to the California Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Home of California in Yountville dates back to 1884 and is considered the largest veterans home in the U.S. with more than 1000 veterans from all wars dating back to World War II.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for more information. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Lucia I. Suarez Sang is a Reporter for FoxNews.com. Follow her on Twitter @luciasuarezsang

Share and Enjoy

Trump on Kim Talks: ‘Tell Him Yes’

The South Korean officials looked at each other as if in disbelief, according to a White House official with knowledge of the meeting, as Mr. Trump continued. He would become the first sitting U.S. president to meet a North Korean leader, if Mr. Kim was sincere and understood the terms. “Tell him yes,” the president said.

That unusual moment touched off a rush by U.S. officials to assemble a diplomatic strategy with little precedent in U.S. history.

White House aides, State Department officials, U.S. intelligence officers and others scrambled to start the work of arranging a summit between Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim to take place as early as May and that must somehow address a range of military, economic and civil-liberties issues that have defied solutions for decades.

The agreement for a meeting between Messrs. Trump and Kim with no advance preparation was considered unusual. The time-honored way for American officials to pursue major arms-control accords has been for negotiators on both sides to clear away many of the sticking points before elevating the remaining obstacles to top leaders.

Mr. Trump has stood the traditional diplomatic model on its head. Casting aside years of protocol, the president agreed to a summit with Mr. Kim before any of his aides had even sat down with a North Korean representative to clarify precisely where Pyongyang stands on fundamental nuclear issues.

The coming weeks will bring a dizzying pace of activity as aides across the federal government prepare for the logistics, strategies and substance of the meeting between the two leaders. Questions regarding U.S. aims, longstanding roadblocks and even the composition of the U.S. negotiating team remain to be addressed.

Trump White House Messaging

In the Thursday meeting among administration officials and South Koreans bearing an offer from Mr. Kim were the president; Vice President

Mike Pence

; Defense Secretary

Jim Mattis

; national security adviser

Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster

;

Matthew Pottinger,

the National Security Council’s top Asia adviser; White House chief of staff

John Kelly

;

Nick Ayers,

the vice president’s chief of staff; and

John Sullivan,

the deputy secretary of State.

During the meeting, Mr. Trump told the South Koreans that they should tell the world about the plans. A small circle of White House officials were aware that the South Koreans were bringing an invitation from Mr. Kim—and that the president would accept it—but the spur-of-the-moment decision from Mr. Trump to have the South Koreans speak for him was unexpected.

The move ensured that the news wouldn’t leak and be massaged and spun by others. “It would have backfired to hold on to this,” one White House official said. “This eliminated the real risks. The story out there now is the truth.”

“He’s so sick of the Foggy Bottom bullshit of diplomacy gray talk of maybe they meant this, maybe they meant that,” the official said. “No one can be confused this way.”

Confident that he had made the right decision, Mr. Trump walked into the White House briefing room to tease reporters about a major upcoming announcement.

The move surprised the reporters—and his own team. Mr. Trump has so rarely entered the briefing room that he was initially surprised when he opened a door to a suite of low-level press assistants. Then he fumbled with the pocket door leading into the briefing room, where he took a group of reporters by surprise.

Mr. Trump agreed to the meeting, believing he is in a prime negotiating position. The White House has said that it hasn’t made any concessions, that Mr. Kim has agreed to talk about eliminating his nuclear arsenal, and that the U.S.’s plan for maximum pressure continues.

But in a sign of some of the complications posed by Mr. Trump’s approach, the White House on Friday appeared to attach new conditions to Mr. Trump’s agreement to meet Mr. Kim.

“The president will not have the meeting without seeing concrete steps and concrete actions take place by North Korea,” said

Sarah Huckabee Sanders,

the White House press secretary, adding Mr. Trump accepted the invitation “based on the promises that they have made.”

Later Friday, officials clarified that the White House​wasn’t outlining any change in position from Thursday’s announcement of a meeting between the U.S. and North Korean leaders.

“The invitation has been extended and accepted, and that stands. We expect the North Koreans to adhere to the assurances they’ve made, and if any of that changes, yes, we’ll have to rethink whether this would happen,” a White House official said.

The U.S. Team

Before Mr. Trump agreed to a meeting with Mr. Kim, the U.S. diplomat who best knew the North Koreans,

Joseph Yun,

decided to resign.

The State Department’s team on North Korea issues now includes

Susan Thornton,

who has yet to be confirmed as an assistant secretary, and

Mark Lambert,

who has assumed Mr. Yun’s duties.

The ambassadorial post at the U.S. embassy in Seoul still stands empty, though the No. 2 diplomat there,

Marc Knapper,

has long experience on North Korean and Asian issues.

Secretary of State

Rex Tillerson

on Friday brushed off questions about the vacancies. “We have very capable, skilled career diplomats ready to step up and serve in those positions and they are serving superbly,” he said.

Setting Up the Rapid-fire Summit

Mr. Trump made the decision to meet Mr. Kim on his own after consulting others, officials said, but now aides will scurry to complete the necessary legwork.

The general plan is for U.S. officials to have preliminary conversations with their North Korean counterparts and determine that they are serious before Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim meet for talks about negotiations at a place and time to be determined.

“The expectation is that the talks would lead to a discussion around a conclusion that we’re ready to engage in negotiations,” a senior State Department official said.

The purpose of Mr. Trump’s meeting would be to build trust before any formal negotiations begin. But questions remain on how Mr. Trump and his American advisers would do so. Would Mr. Trump engage in a largely unscripted meeting with Mr. Kim? Would each leader read a prearranged statement? Or would officials from the two sides try to draw up a joint statement of principles that Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim could announce as a guide to subsequent talks?

“The latter would be a more impressive outcome, obviously, but trying to negotiate it and failing would be seen as a setback,” said

Robert J. Einhorn,

a former State Department official, who negotiated with North Korean officials during the Clinton administration.

How Speedy Talks Affect Success or Failure

Mr. Trump’s unorthodox approach could accelerate the negotiating process or at least enable the administration to put Mr. Kim’s expressed willingness to discuss the elimination of his nuclear arsenal to an early test.

But without careful diplomatic preparations over the next several weeks, some experts warn, it could be a rush to failure.

“In diplomacy, a meeting with the president of the United States is at the very high end of what we have to offer and is normally the culmination of some serious and constructive work in which the other side demonstrates that they are serious about reaching an agreement,” said

Daniel Russel,

who served as the State Department’s top official on Asia during the second Obama administration and is now at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

“Without being excessively conventional about it, there is a real question about the wisdom of reversing the sequence and beginning by granting a meeting with the president, something the North Koreans have asked for again and again, at a moment when all they are offering are vague caveated promises,” Mr. Russel added.

Other experts say the North Koreans may be serious about trying to reach some sort of accommodation with the U.S., and a high-profile summit meeting could be the long-awaited start of a potentially constructive dialogue.

“This is serious stuff for the North Koreans [for someone] to have a meeting with their leader,” said Joel S. Wit, a former State Department official.

The Meaning of Denuclearization

There is a risk the two sides have wildly differing expectations about the pace at which denuclearization might be achieved and what the U.S. should offer in return. Will the elimination of nuclear weapons be a distant goal or a more immediate objective, and how would either come about?

Some former U.S. officials believe it is highly unlikely that North Korea would ever agree to give up its nuclear weapons, an assessment shared by U.S. intelligence analysts. Nor, they say, would Pyongyang be eager to agree to the sort of on-site verification that would be needed to assure such an agreement.

Instead or risking a diplomatic failure by overreaching, they say, the White House would be wise to concentrate initially on more limited steps.

“We could verify an agreement that banned testing of nuclear weapons and long-range missiles,” said

William J. Perry,

who served as defense secretary when the Clinton administration wrestled with North Korea. “It would be equally in our interest to have an agreement stopping the proliferation of North Korean nuclear components and technology.”

There was little hint, however, that Mr. Trump was prepared to temper his expectations. After the South Korean announcement that Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim would meet, the White House rushed out a statement. “We look forward to the denuclearization of North Korea,” it said. “In the meantime, all sanctions and maximum pressure must remain.”

The North Korean Dilemma

Two previous presidential administrations—

Bill Clinton’s

and

George W. Bush’s

—tried in vain to temper North Korea’s nuclear-weapons ambitions.

In each case, the efforts collapsed with U.S. accusing Pyongyang of cheating, which North Korea denied.

Mr. Perry said he was skeptical that North Korea would ever fully give up its nuclear weapons—and just as skeptical that the U.S. could ensure compliance if Pyongyang ever did agree.

“It is a fundamental error to think that we could reliably verify a treaty by which North Korea agreed to dismantle all of their nuclear weapons,” he said.

North Korea has long been a skillful manipulator, cautioned

Evan Medeiros,

a former senior Obama administration official who is now managing director at Eurasia Group in Washington.

“Trump will be walking into talks with Kim before the U.S. has thoroughly debated and prepared internally for the encounter, let alone having adequately discussed the situation with allies and friends,” Mr. Medeiros wrote in a note to clients.

A senior Trump administration official defended the current initiative in the face of warnings of such pitfalls.

“It made sense to accept an invitation to meet with the one person who can actually make decisions, instead of repeating the sort of long slog of the past,” the official said.

—Jonathan Cheng and Andrew Jeong in Seoul and Alastair Gale in Tokyo contributed to this article.

Write to Michael R. Gordon at michael.gordon@wsj.com, Michael C. Bender at Mike.Bender@wsj.com and Felicia Schwartz at Felicia.Schwartz@wsj.com

Share and Enjoy