Report: Hotel video shows gunman’s movements in days before Las Vegas massacre
March 23, 2018 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
LAS VEGAS – In surveillance video obtained by the New York Times, Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock’s movements within the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino are seen in the days leading up to the Oct. 1 massacre that left 58 dead. Police say Paddock, 64, opened fire on attendees of the Route 91 Harvest country music festival from his 32nd-floor suite that night.
He killed himself just before authorities stormed his room. His motive remains a mystery.
In the video clips obtained by the Times, Paddock is seen leaving the hotel multiple times for his home in Mesquite — about 80 miles away — returning in a minivan filled with suitcases and chatting with bellhops as they stack the luggage on carts and help him transport it upstairs.
According to the Times, he transported 21 bags over the course of seven days – inside were the arsenal of weapons he used to carry out the massacre.
Police say Stephen Paddock (inset) opened fire through two windows on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas, Oct. 1, 2017.
Paddock is unassuming in the video, riding the elevator, gambling, eating and tipping staff. The hotel’s parent company has previously said the multiple interactions Paddock had with staff — including a room service delivery and a call with housekeeping on the day of the shooting — were “normal in nature.”
The video shows how Paddock was able to blend in among hotel guests while at the same time apparently meticulously planning the mass shooting, the deadliest in U.S. history.
The New York Times obtained the video from Mandalay Bay’s parent company, MGM Resorts.
Share and Enjoy
Tillerson Says Goodbye to ‘a Very Mean-Spirited Town’
March 23, 2018 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
Later that day, Mr. Goldstein and several other aides who were close to Mr. Tillerson also were fired by the White House. Officials said John F. Kelly, the chief of staff, had tried to warn Mr. Tillerson in a phone call days earlier by saying, cryptically, “you may get a tweet.” White House officials also added that Mr. Tillerson had been on the toilet at the time of the call.
Mr. Tillerson will likely be remembered as among the least successful secretaries of state in recent history, having alienated much of the White House staff and most of his own department with an imperious style, skeletal leadership team and missteps on the international stage.
Just as problematic were his frequent disagreements with Mr. Trump over key policy decisions, such as whether to remain in the Paris climate accord, how to broker the dispute between Saudi Arabia and Qatar and whether and when to engage in discussions with North Korea.
One of Mr. Tillerson’s most difficult moments came over the summer, when NBC News revealed that he had called the president a “moron” in a meeting with senior officials. Although he held a news conference that day to heap praise on Mr. Trump, Mr. Tillerson never denied making the remark, a refusal that rankled the president.
In his speech on Thursday, Mr. Tillerson hinted at a possible reason for his non-denial.
“Never lose sight of your most valuable asset, the most valuable asset you possess: your personal integrity,” Mr. Tillerson said. He added: “Only you can relinquish it or allow it to be compromised. Once you’ve done so, it is very very hard to regain it. So guard it as the most precious thing you possess.”
Newsletter Sign Up
Continue reading the main story
Thank you for subscribing.
An error has occurred. Please try again later.
You are already subscribed to this email.
Mr. Tillerson had frequently dismissed reports that his department was experiencing an exodus of top diplomatic talent — even though the State Department’s personnel office issued data demonstrating that hundreds of officials were fleeing.
The most puzzling part of Mr. Tillerson’s time at the State Department was the organizational chaos that defined his tenure.
As a former chief executive of Exxon Mobil, Mr. Tillerson’s management chops were supposed to be his chief calling card. But he failed to get even half of his leadership team in place, a first in American history.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Those who did get top jobs were not allowed to make even small decisions without Mr. Tillerson’s approval, leading to paralysis. In just one example, the State Department has yet to spend any of the $120 million that Congress allocated to counter Russia’s election meddling.
He presided over a reorganization effort that spent millions of dollars on outside consultants and thousands of hours of staff consultations. At the end, however, the suggested changes were almost exactly the same as those given to him by managers on his first day in office. In his final weeks in office, Mr. Tillerson stopped mentioning the reorganization that he had once identified as his top priority.
Since his firing, Mr. Tillerson has focused on ensuring a smooth transition, ordering a slew of memorandums by staff and waiting for a personal meeting with Mr. Pompeo.
Despite his unpopularity with diplomats, Mr. Tillerson was credited by many observers with being a voice of moderation in an administration that has presided over deteriorating relations in almost every corner of the world.
“His support for the Paris climate accord and the Iran nuclear deal, and his conception of having talks about talks with North Korea, I thought all of those were correct,” said R. Nicholas Burns, a former career foreign service officer who was once Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s right-hand man. “But he was a disastrous manager, and morale at the department plummeted.”
“So it’s a complicated epitaph,” Mr. Burns said.
Continue reading the main story